Performance Comparison of Deep Learning Models for CO2 Prediction: Analyzing Carbon Footprint with Advanced Trackers

Climate change and global warming demand immediate global action to protect future generations. Although deep learning is crucial for solving complex tasks, its high energy consumption and carbon emissions from extensive training processes necessitate improvements in efficiency to reduce its environmental impact. This research addresses the need for accurate carbon emission tracking to mitigate climate change and promote sustainable development. We evaluated deep learning models—specifically, the Temporal Fusion Transformer (TFT), Attention-based LSTM (Att-LSTM), and standard LSTM—in predicting CO2 emissions using datasets from World Bank Indicators (WBI) and Our World in Data (OWID). The results highlight TFT’s superiority, achieving the lowest mean squared error (MSE) in validation (0.0029) compared to Att-LSTM (0.0070) and LSTM (0.0072). Additionally, TFT demonstrates a lower root mean squared error (RMSE) in validation (0.0539) than both Att-LSTM (0.0712) and LSTM (0.0909), showcasing its enhanced predictive accuracy across evaluation tools like CarbonTracker, eco2AI, and CodeCarbon. Furthermore, TFT consistently outperforms LSTM in computational efficiency and carbon emissions, despite LSTM’s lower power usage but higher emissions in specific scenarios. These findings underscore TFT's pivotal role in formulating effective climate policies and promoting renewable energy sources, emphasizing its potential to significantly contribute to global warming mitigation and sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825767
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Comparison of Deep Learning Models for CO2 Prediction: Analyzing Carbon Footprint with Advanced Trackers

T. N. Singh, Rupesh Kumar Sah, Rajiv Misra, Sumit Kumar Singh et al.
1 citations
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
0.28
article

Performance Comparison of Deep Learning Models for CO2 Prediction: Analyzing Carbon Footprint with Advanced Trackers

T. N. Singh, Rupesh Kumar Sah, Rajiv Misra, Sumit Kumar Singh, Anil Verma
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Climate change and global warming demand immediate global action to protect future generations. Although deep learning is crucial for solving complex tasks, its high energy consumption and carbon emissions from extensive training processes necessitate improvements in efficiency to reduce its environmental impact. This research addresses the need for accurate carbon emission tracking to mitigate climate change and promote sustainable development. We evaluated deep learning models—specifically, the Temporal Fusion Transformer (TFT), Attention-based LSTM (Att-LSTM), and standard LSTM—in predicting CO2 emissions using datasets from World Bank Indicators (WBI) and Our World in Data (OWID). The results highlight TFT’s superiority, achieving the lowest mean squared error (MSE) in validation (0.0029) compared to Att-LSTM (0.0070) and LSTM (0.0072). Additionally, TFT demonstrates a lower root mean squared error (RMSE) in validation (0.0539) than both Att-LSTM (0.0712) and LSTM (0.0909), showcasing its enhanced predictive accuracy across evaluation tools like CarbonTracker, eco2AI, and CodeCarbon. Furthermore, TFT consistently outperforms LSTM in computational efficiency and carbon emissions, despite LSTM’s lower power usage but higher emissions in specific scenarios. These findings underscore TFT's pivotal role in formulating effective climate policies and promoting renewable energy sources, emphasizing its potential to significantly contribute to global warming mitigation and sustainability.

Indian Institute of Technology Patna (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.