Use of AI in Education - A Case Study from Norway

Although Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been around since around the 1950's, it is the past 10 years that it has had an almost revolutionary adoption by the public. With the way the new tool has a positive utilization as it can produce material for organizations, such as reports, presentations and promotion material. For academia, however, there are other uses that is concerning, particularly regarding learning issues. Several times, students have been caught handing in assignments and even exams that have been mostly produced by AI tools. It has been a discussion within the academic community on whether or not this is cheating or just less independent or original work. Cheating will result in assignments or exam is not approved, less independent or original work will result in a lower grade. But whether we like it or not, AI tools is not a passing trend, and we have to find ways of using them as tools rather than means for cheating. This paper will present how investigations over two years and with the personal experiences of a student displayed through autoethnography, provide insight into a positive use of AI tools and possible guidelines for use in an academic setting.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ithet61869.2024.10837660
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of AI in Education - A Case Study from Norway

Tone Vold, Andrea S. S. Eikset
1 citations
Online Learning and Analytics
0.41
article

Use of AI in Education - A Case Study from Norway

Tone Vold, Andrea S. S. Eikset
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been around since around the 1950's, it is the past 10 years that it has had an almost revolutionary adoption by the public. With the way the new tool has a positive utilization as it can produce material for organizations, such as reports, presentations and promotion material. For academia, however, there are other uses that is concerning, particularly regarding learning issues. Several times, students have been caught handing in assignments and even exams that have been mostly produced by AI tools. It has been a discussion within the academic community on whether or not this is cheating or just less independent or original work. Cheating will result in assignments or exam is not approved, less independent or original work will result in a lower grade. But whether we like it or not, AI tools is not a passing trend, and we have to find ways of using them as tools rather than means for cheating. This paper will present how investigations over two years and with the personal experiences of a student displayed through autoethnography, provide insight into a positive use of AI tools and possible guidelines for use in an academic setting.

Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Online Learning and Analytics
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.