Creating, Sustaining, and Evaluating Personalized Digital Health Systems

Personal health informatics (PHI) aims to provide individuals with personalized, actionable health insights through digital platforms. Despite advancements in digital health, a standardized framework to evaluate the personalization of digital health solutions remains absent. Developers often rely on "free-form" or "weak" personalization, contributing to high user attrition and non-personalized "cold start" experiences. This paper examines the evolution of personalization in digital health, covering early web-based systems, data-driven advancements, behavioral theory integration, and AI-driven personalization. We propose the development of PERSEID (Personalization Index for Digital Health) to measure and enhance personalization in digital health. This index, guided by a comprehensive ontology, will assess multiple personalization dimensions, adapting to users' evolving behaviors over time. By addressing current gaps and establishing a validated personalization framework, PERSEID aims to enhance the effectiveness of personalized digital health systems, ultimately advancing the field of PHI and supporting improved health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825134
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creating, Sustaining, and Evaluating Personalized Digital Health Systems

Scott Sittig, M. Sriram Iyengar, José F. Flórez-Arango, Beenish Moalla Chaudhry
1 citations
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
0.85
article

Creating, Sustaining, and Evaluating Personalized Digital Health Systems

Scott Sittig, M. Sriram Iyengar, José F. Flórez-Arango, Beenish Moalla Chaudhry
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Personal health informatics (PHI) aims to provide individuals with personalized, actionable health insights through digital platforms. Despite advancements in digital health, a standardized framework to evaluate the personalization of digital health solutions remains absent. Developers often rely on "free-form" or "weak" personalization, contributing to high user attrition and non-personalized "cold start" experiences. This paper examines the evolution of personalization in digital health, covering early web-based systems, data-driven advancements, behavioral theory integration, and AI-driven personalization. We propose the development of PERSEID (Personalization Index for Digital Health) to measure and enhance personalization in digital health. This index, guided by a comprehensive ontology, will assess multiple personalization dimensions, adapting to users' evolving behaviors over time. By addressing current gaps and establishing a validated personalization framework, PERSEID aims to enhance the effectiveness of personalized digital health systems, ultimately advancing the field of PHI and supporting improved health outcomes.

University of Arizona (US), Cornell University (US), University of Louisiana at Lafayette (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Creating, Sustaining, and Evaluating Personalized Digital Health Systems — Scott Sittig, M. Sriram Iyengar, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS