A Comparative Study of 2D and 3D Convolutional Neural Networks for Melanoma Classification

Skin Melanoma is a lethal type of cancer. The early diagnosis of which is crucial to improve the survival rate of the patients. Convolution neural networks are at the heart of the deep learning algorithms. In the present work authors have experimentally compared 2D and 3D Convolution Neural Network (CNN) models to identify the melanoma. We have employed three different types of datasets namely PH2, ISIC archive, and ISIC skin cancer datasets. We applied the two models on each of the datasets to determine their accuracy, precision, recall, f1 score and ROC curves. The experimental results provide the insights about the advantages and limitations of using 2D and 3D CNN models for the identification of skin melanoma. The authors have observed that 2D CNN model shows enhanced capabilities to detect skin lesion structures compared to 3D CNN. Moreover, the classification accuracy of the 2D CNN is also found better than 3D CNN.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icec59683.2024.10837451
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of 2D and 3D Convolutional Neural Networks for Melanoma Classification

Mudassir Rafi, Thireesha Suryadevara, Naveenkumar Mahamkali, Rushitha Nalamothu
AI in cancer detection
article

A Comparative Study of 2D and 3D Convolutional Neural Networks for Melanoma Classification

Mudassir Rafi, Thireesha Suryadevara, Naveenkumar Mahamkali, Rushitha Nalamothu
article en

Abstract

Skin Melanoma is a lethal type of cancer. The early diagnosis of which is crucial to improve the survival rate of the patients. Convolution neural networks are at the heart of the deep learning algorithms. In the present work authors have experimentally compared 2D and 3D Convolution Neural Network (CNN) models to identify the melanoma. We have employed three different types of datasets namely PH2, ISIC archive, and ISIC skin cancer datasets. We applied the two models on each of the datasets to determine their accuracy, precision, recall, f1 score and ROC curves. The experimental results provide the insights about the advantages and limitations of using 2D and 3D CNN models for the identification of skin melanoma. The authors have observed that 2D CNN model shows enhanced capabilities to detect skin lesion structures compared to 3D CNN. Moreover, the classification accuracy of the 2D CNN is also found better than 3D CNN.

SRM University (IN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Study of 2D and 3D Convolutional Neural Networks for Melanoma Classification — Mudassir Rafi, Thireesha Suryadevara, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS