Integrating Flow and Structure in Diagrams for Data Science

In Data Science, data modeling (including relational databases and big data) has traditionally used Entity-Relationship (ER) diagrams to represent structural characteristics of data. However, ER diagrams lack the capability to capture the flow and transformation of data through analytic pipelines, which are essential to manage modern data science workflows. On the other hand, flowcharts have been used for decades to describe the processing. Based on this motivation, this paper provides a historical perspective identifying the limitations of employing ER diagrams and Data Flow Diagrams (DFDs), separately, emphasizing the need to integrate both solutions. We examine established diagram notations and design models, including traditional models such as UML, ER, DFD, BPMN, and FLOWER. Our literature analysis suggests that integrative diagram approaches can provide a more intuitive and comprehensive understanding of data collection, data integration, and data transformation for big data analytics in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10826098
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Database Systems and Queries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Flow and Structure in Diagrams for Data Science

Elio Masciari, Enea Vincenzo Napolitano, Carlos Ordońẽz
1 citations
Advanced Database Systems and Queries
0.35
article

Integrating Flow and Structure in Diagrams for Data Science

Elio Masciari, Enea Vincenzo Napolitano, Carlos Ordońẽz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In Data Science, data modeling (including relational databases and big data) has traditionally used Entity-Relationship (ER) diagrams to represent structural characteristics of data. However, ER diagrams lack the capability to capture the flow and transformation of data through analytic pipelines, which are essential to manage modern data science workflows. On the other hand, flowcharts have been used for decades to describe the processing. Based on this motivation, this paper provides a historical perspective identifying the limitations of employing ER diagrams and Data Flow Diagrams (DFDs), separately, emphasizing the need to integrate both solutions. We examine established diagram notations and design models, including traditional models such as UML, ER, DFD, BPMN, and FLOWER. Our literature analysis suggests that integrative diagram approaches can provide a more intuitive and comprehensive understanding of data collection, data integration, and data transformation for big data analytics in the future.

University of Houston (US), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Advanced Database Systems and Queries
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.