Breakpoints in Iterative Development and Interdisciplinary Collaboration of AI-Driven Automated Assessment

The rise of AI in education has led to significant advancements, promoting automated grading to reduce educator workload and to enhance pedagogy. However, its integration raises complex pedagogical, ethical, and technical questions. This systematic review examines the intersection of automated grading tool development and educational assessment through the lens of the activity theory. Our analysis, informed by literature since 2010, reveals a critical need for comprehensive evaluation frameworks addressing the iterative nature of technology development and interdisciplinary collaboration. Key breakpoints in existing studies include oversight of the reliability and validity of assessments, ethical considerations, coherent evaluation rules, interdisciplinary collaboration, and agentive and constructive roles of users. Addressing these issues requires a holistic approach that bridges technical and educational perspectives, fostering trust and supporting meaningful learning outcomes. Enhanced collaboration and ongoing professional development are crucial for creating AI-driven assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ithet61869.2024.10837673
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Higher Education Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breakpoints in Iterative Development and Interdisciplinary Collaboration of AI-Driven Automated Assessment

Li-Hsin Chang, Filip Ginter, Koen Veermans, Xiaoshan Huang
3 citations
Higher Education Learning Practices
6.29
article

Breakpoints in Iterative Development and Interdisciplinary Collaboration of AI-Driven Automated Assessment

Li-Hsin Chang, Filip Ginter, Koen Veermans, Xiaoshan Huang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The rise of AI in education has led to significant advancements, promoting automated grading to reduce educator workload and to enhance pedagogy. However, its integration raises complex pedagogical, ethical, and technical questions. This systematic review examines the intersection of automated grading tool development and educational assessment through the lens of the activity theory. Our analysis, informed by literature since 2010, reveals a critical need for comprehensive evaluation frameworks addressing the iterative nature of technology development and interdisciplinary collaboration. Key breakpoints in existing studies include oversight of the reliability and validity of assessments, ethical considerations, coherent evaluation rules, interdisciplinary collaboration, and agentive and constructive roles of users. Addressing these issues requires a holistic approach that bridges technical and educational perspectives, fostering trust and supporting meaningful learning outcomes. Enhanced collaboration and ongoing professional development are crucial for creating AI-driven assessments.

University of Turku (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Higher Education Learning Practices
6.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.