Energy Infrastructure Risk Modeling using Quantum and Classical Machine Learning

The integrity of energy infrastructure is critical to societal stability, yet it is increasingly vulnerable to diverse natural and man-made hazards. These hazards create interdependent risks that challenge conventional risk management models. This study explores hazard modeling approaches for energy infrastructure using classical machine learning (ML) and quantum machine learning (QML) techniques. We develop Deep Neural Networks (DNN), Naïve Bayes (NB), Decision Tree (DT), and Quantum Neural Networks (QNN) deployed in a 127-qubit quantum computer to classify hazard levels. Further, we propose a Bayesian network to model vulnerability propagation within the infrastructure. Comparing QML models against classical ML benchmarks provides insights into QML’s potential benefits and limitations for complex, high-dimensional data in critical infrastructure applications. This paper presents data analysis, model development, and comparison of classical and quantum methods to advance energy infrastructure risk modeling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825420
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Smart Grid Security and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy Infrastructure Risk Modeling using Quantum and Classical Machine Learning

Thilanka Munasinghe, Neelanga Thelasingha
2 citations
Smart Grid Security and Resilience
0.66
article

Energy Infrastructure Risk Modeling using Quantum and Classical Machine Learning

Thilanka Munasinghe, Neelanga Thelasingha
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The integrity of energy infrastructure is critical to societal stability, yet it is increasingly vulnerable to diverse natural and man-made hazards. These hazards create interdependent risks that challenge conventional risk management models. This study explores hazard modeling approaches for energy infrastructure using classical machine learning (ML) and quantum machine learning (QML) techniques. We develop Deep Neural Networks (DNN), Naïve Bayes (NB), Decision Tree (DT), and Quantum Neural Networks (QNN) deployed in a 127-qubit quantum computer to classify hazard levels. Further, we propose a Bayesian network to model vulnerability propagation within the infrastructure. Comparing QML models against classical ML benchmarks provides insights into QML’s potential benefits and limitations for complex, high-dimensional data in critical infrastructure applications. This paper presents data analysis, model development, and comparison of classical and quantum methods to advance energy infrastructure risk modeling.

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Smart Grid Security and Resilience
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.