Comparison of Methods for Calculating the Capacitance and Internal Resistance of Electrical Double-Layer Capacitors

When evaluating the characteristics of electrical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs), also called supercapacitors (SCs), calculating the capacitance and internal resistance is often necessary. The variety of approaches available for determining these parameters can confuse the researcher and lead to erroneous results. To highlight the features of the practical application of the principles under consideration, in this paper, the authors compare 6 methods for calculating the capacitance and internal resistance of EDLCs. On the basis of the results of computer modelling of electrical equivalent circuits, the linear approximation method (LAM) and energy conversion method (ECM) in galvanostatic charge / discharge (GCD) mode demonstrate high accuracy of capacitance calculations subject to the conditions set out in the IEC 62391 standard. However, in the presence of noticeable distortions of the GCD curves, the most effective is the ECM based on the analysis of the entire discharge section. The low-frequency alternating current method (ACM) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) should be used with caution when the internal resistance of EDLCs is high since a significant error in the capacitance estimate is possible. It is also shown that the internal resistance, estimated by the magnitude of the voltage drop at the moment of switching from the charging mode to the discharging mode, can differ by tens of times from the resistance calculated by approximating a limited linear section of the discharge curve using the least squares method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/dynamics64718.2024.10838548
Primary Topic
Electrical Contact Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Methods for Calculating the Capacitance and Internal Resistance of Electrical Double-Layer Capacitors

С. Н. Несов, S. A. Matyushenkо
1 links
Electrical Contact Performance and Analysis
article

Comparison of Methods for Calculating the Capacitance and Internal Resistance of Electrical Double-Layer Capacitors

С. Н. Несов, S. A. Matyushenkо
article en

Abstract

When evaluating the characteristics of electrical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs), also called supercapacitors (SCs), calculating the capacitance and internal resistance is often necessary. The variety of approaches available for determining these parameters can confuse the researcher and lead to erroneous results. To highlight the features of the practical application of the principles under consideration, in this paper, the authors compare 6 methods for calculating the capacitance and internal resistance of EDLCs. On the basis of the results of computer modelling of electrical equivalent circuits, the linear approximation method (LAM) and energy conversion method (ECM) in galvanostatic charge / discharge (GCD) mode demonstrate high accuracy of capacitance calculations subject to the conditions set out in the IEC 62391 standard. However, in the presence of noticeable distortions of the GCD curves, the most effective is the ECM based on the analysis of the entire discharge section. The low-frequency alternating current method (ACM) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) should be used with caution when the internal resistance of EDLCs is high since a significant error in the capacitance estimate is possible. It is also shown that the internal resistance, estimated by the magnitude of the voltage drop at the moment of switching from the charging mode to the discharging mode, can differ by tens of times from the resistance calculated by approximating a limited linear section of the discharge curve using the least squares method.

Krasnoyarsk Scientific Center (RU)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Electrical Contact Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.