Model Selection for HERITAGE-AI: Evaluating LLMs for Contextual Data Analysis of Maryland’s Domestic Traffic Ads (1824–1864)

The HERITAGE-AI (Harnessing Enhanced Research and Instructional Technologies for Archival Generative Exploration using AI), as part of the IMLS grant initiative, GenAI-4-Archive, aims to analyze sensitive historical datasets ethically using advanced AI technologies. One of the key tasks of this project focuses on selecting the most suitable Large Language Model (LLM) for analyzing the Domestic Traffic Ads (DTA) published in Maryland between 1824 and 1864 by slave traders—a dataset rich in historical significance yet fraught with ethical considerations. Analyzing sensitive historical datasets presents unique ethical and technical challenges. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of leading LLMs to identify the optimal model to meet HERITAGE-AI’s objectives. We survey contemporary models, including OpenAI’s GPT-4o, Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet, Meta’s Llama 3.2, and Google’s Gemini, to identify the most suitable model for Generative AI-based analysis of the DTA dataset. The objective is to select an LLM that can handle the sensitive nature of the data responsibly while providing accurate and insightful analysis. Three critical evaluation criteria, among others, are established for this reason: Sensitivity to Historical Context, Privacy and Security, and Customizability. Our analysis follows a three-step approach: evaluating free versions, paid versions, and enterprise-grade cloud-based implementations of these LLMs. Our findings reveal that while free and paid versions offer varying degrees of accessibility, they fall short in providing the necessary privacy, security, multi-user access, and customization required for analyzing sensitive historical data like the DTA dataset. In the third step, by comparing the cloud-based implementations of Azure OpenAI’s GPT-4o, AWS Bedrock’s Claude, and AWS Bedrock’s Llama3.2 LLMs, Azure openAI GPT-4o emerges as the most suitable option for this project. Although GPT-4o and Claude were close contenders, Gpt-4o demonstrated robust mechanisms due to its high accuracy, ethical sensitivity, robust privacy controls, and scalability in a cloud-based environment. It also offers extensive customizability, allowing for effective integration of the DTA dataset and alignment with the project’s ethical standards. Future work will involve domain experts and community members in implementing Azure OpenAI GPT-4o for the DTA dataset analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825591
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model Selection for HERITAGE-AI: Evaluating LLMs for Contextual Data Analysis of Maryland’s Domestic Traffic Ads (1824–1864)

Rajesh Kumar Gnanasekaran, Lori Perine, Richard Marciano, Mark F. Conrad
1 citations
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
0.25
article

Model Selection for HERITAGE-AI: Evaluating LLMs for Contextual Data Analysis of Maryland’s Domestic Traffic Ads (1824–1864)

Rajesh Kumar Gnanasekaran, Lori Perine, Richard Marciano, Mark F. Conrad
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The HERITAGE-AI (Harnessing Enhanced Research and Instructional Technologies for Archival Generative Exploration using AI), as part of the IMLS grant initiative, GenAI-4-Archive, aims to analyze sensitive historical datasets ethically using advanced AI technologies. One of the key tasks of this project focuses on selecting the most suitable Large Language Model (LLM) for analyzing the Domestic Traffic Ads (DTA) published in Maryland between 1824 and 1864 by slave traders—a dataset rich in historical significance yet fraught with ethical considerations. Analyzing sensitive historical datasets presents unique ethical and technical challenges. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of leading LLMs to identify the optimal model to meet HERITAGE-AI’s objectives. We survey contemporary models, including OpenAI’s GPT-4o, Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet, Meta’s Llama 3.2, and Google’s Gemini, to identify the most suitable model for Generative AI-based analysis of the DTA dataset. The objective is to select an LLM that can handle the sensitive nature of the data responsibly while providing accurate and insightful analysis. Three critical evaluation criteria, among others, are established for this reason: Sensitivity to Historical Context, Privacy and Security, and Customizability. Our analysis follows a three-step approach: evaluating free versions, paid versions, and enterprise-grade cloud-based implementations of these LLMs. Our findings reveal that while free and paid versions offer varying degrees of accessibility, they fall short in providing the necessary privacy, security, multi-user access, and customization required for analyzing sensitive historical data like the DTA dataset. In the third step, by comparing the cloud-based implementations of Azure OpenAI’s GPT-4o, AWS Bedrock’s Claude, and AWS Bedrock’s Llama3.2 LLMs, Azure openAI GPT-4o emerges as the most suitable option for this project. Although GPT-4o and Claude were close contenders, Gpt-4o demonstrated robust mechanisms due to its high accuracy, ethical sensitivity, robust privacy controls, and scalability in a cloud-based environment. It also offers extensive customizability, allowing for effective integration of the DTA dataset and alignment with the project’s ethical standards. Future work will involve domain experts and community members in implementing Azure OpenAI GPT-4o for the DTA dataset analysis.

University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Institute of Museum and Library Services
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
0.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.