An Ethical Reflection Aid for Responsible AI in Computational Archival Science

AI implementations continue to grow in cultural heritage settings and have deep connections to how computational archival science is conducted. This paper reviews how AI is being implemented in computational archival science. It then provides an overview of ethical issues and considerations when implementing AI for computational archival science. Our research team has developed an evidence-based ethical reflection aid to guide library and archives practitioners through responsible implementations of AI. When using the ethical reflection aid practitioners consider a specific AI implementation scenario, consider how the different values held by different stakeholders may align or come into conflict, and outline potential actions for responsible AI. We present an example of using the ethical reflection aid to examine a scenario related to computational archival science. Ultimately, this paper suggests that careful examination of stakeholder values can support a more responsible computational archival science practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825205
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Ethical Reflection Aid for Responsible AI in Computational Archival Science

Sara Mannheimer, Yasmeen Shorish, Bonnie Sheehey, Scott W. H. Young et al.
1 citations
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
0.53
article

An Ethical Reflection Aid for Responsible AI in Computational Archival Science

Sara Mannheimer, Yasmeen Shorish, Bonnie Sheehey, Scott W. H. Young, Hannah Scates Kettler, Jason A. Clark, Natalie Bond, Doralyn Rossmann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

AI implementations continue to grow in cultural heritage settings and have deep connections to how computational archival science is conducted. This paper reviews how AI is being implemented in computational archival science. It then provides an overview of ethical issues and considerations when implementing AI for computational archival science. Our research team has developed an evidence-based ethical reflection aid to guide library and archives practitioners through responsible implementations of AI. When using the ethical reflection aid practitioners consider a specific AI implementation scenario, consider how the different values held by different stakeholders may align or come into conflict, and outline potential actions for responsible AI. We present an example of using the ethical reflection aid to examine a scenario related to computational archival science. Ultimately, this paper suggests that careful examination of stakeholder values can support a more responsible computational archival science practice.

James Madison University (US), Iowa State University (US), Montana State University (US), State Library of Iowa (US), University of Montana (US)
Institute of Museum and Library Services
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Ethical Reflection Aid for Responsible AI in Computational Archival Science — Sara Mannheimer, Yasmeen Shorish, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS