Reject Inference as a Noisy Label Detection and Counterfactual Correction Task

A burgeoning body of research seeks to develop ever more accurate automated credit evaluation systems. At the same time, reject inference can help financial institutions identify applicants who are mistakenly deemed non–creditworthy, or whose applications are approved even though they end up defaulting. However, both machine learning models and reject inference methods assume perfect decisions, the former for training and the latter for inference. In this work, we challenge this assumption, and explore the feasibility of identifying erroneously rejected (or accepted) loan applications using noisy and counterfactual learning. Experiments on a small benchmark and a large, real– world dataset, demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825183
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reject Inference as a Noisy Label Detection and Counterfactual Correction Task

Khandker Sadia Rahman, Charalampos Chelmis, Mahsa Azarshab, Mehrdad Mirpourian
1 citations
Machine Learning and Data Classification
0.35
article

Reject Inference as a Noisy Label Detection and Counterfactual Correction Task

Khandker Sadia Rahman, Charalampos Chelmis, Mahsa Azarshab, Mehrdad Mirpourian
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A burgeoning body of research seeks to develop ever more accurate automated credit evaluation systems. At the same time, reject inference can help financial institutions identify applicants who are mistakenly deemed non–creditworthy, or whose applications are approved even though they end up defaulting. However, both machine learning models and reject inference methods assume perfect decisions, the former for training and the latter for inference. In this work, we challenge this assumption, and explore the feasibility of identifying erroneously rejected (or accepted) loan applications using noisy and counterfactual learning. Experiments on a small benchmark and a large, real– world dataset, demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.

Women's World Banking (US), University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Machine Learning and Data Classification
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.