Vision Paper: Are Identity Verification Systems Adequately Tailored for Neurodivergent Individuals?

Security measures like identity verification are extensively implemented and seamlessly integrated into daily life. However, these systems are often not designed to accommodate the needs of neurodivergent individuals, leading to potential accessibility and reliability challenges. Neurodiverse populations exhibit differences in cognitive abilities, behavior, and learning processes, including difficulties with memory and attention. These obstacles prevent users from recalling information or accessing instructions. Furthermore, neurodivergent individuals are more prone to exhibit differences in eye gaze, keystroke dynamics, or speech patterns than neurotypical populations. Individuals with neurodevelopmental conditions often exhibit cognitive and sensory differences that can render traditional identity verification systems less effective. This demographic disparity can increase susceptibility to cyberattacks, underscoring the urgent need for further research. The proposed study highlights these disparities and urges the community to explore strategies to improve fairness and effectiveness in such systems. This paper emphasizes the importance of modifying user identity confirmation technologies to suit better neurodiverse populations and advocates for developing more inclusive and accessible systems. It is crucial to ensure that security technologies, such as biometrics, are inclusive and effective for all users, including neurodivergent users. The proposed research promotes equal access and ethical practices in verifying digital identity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825366
Primary Topic
Biometric Identification and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vision Paper: Are Identity Verification Systems Adequately Tailored for Neurodivergent Individuals?

Emanuela Marasco, Nora McDonald, Vivian Genaro Motti
Biometric Identification and Security
article

Vision Paper: Are Identity Verification Systems Adequately Tailored for Neurodivergent Individuals?

Emanuela Marasco, Nora McDonald, Vivian Genaro Motti
article en

Abstract

Security measures like identity verification are extensively implemented and seamlessly integrated into daily life. However, these systems are often not designed to accommodate the needs of neurodivergent individuals, leading to potential accessibility and reliability challenges. Neurodiverse populations exhibit differences in cognitive abilities, behavior, and learning processes, including difficulties with memory and attention. These obstacles prevent users from recalling information or accessing instructions. Furthermore, neurodivergent individuals are more prone to exhibit differences in eye gaze, keystroke dynamics, or speech patterns than neurotypical populations. Individuals with neurodevelopmental conditions often exhibit cognitive and sensory differences that can render traditional identity verification systems less effective. This demographic disparity can increase susceptibility to cyberattacks, underscoring the urgent need for further research. The proposed study highlights these disparities and urges the community to explore strategies to improve fairness and effectiveness in such systems. This paper emphasizes the importance of modifying user identity confirmation technologies to suit better neurodiverse populations and advocates for developing more inclusive and accessible systems. It is crucial to ensure that security technologies, such as biometrics, are inclusive and effective for all users, including neurodivergent users. The proposed research promotes equal access and ethical practices in verifying digital identity.

George Mason University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Biometric Identification and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.