Modeling Lunar Surface Charging Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Modeling the electric potential profile above the lunar surface is critical for understanding surface charging and interactions with the space environment. Traditional methods like Particle-in-Cell (PIC) simulations are highly accurate but computationally expensive. To address this, we propose a hybrid approach using a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) architecture in both data-driven neural networks and Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). The PINN component incorporates physical laws directly into the training process, ensuring physical consistency, while the data-driven component captures complex patterns. This combination offers a significant reduction in computational cost compared to PIC methods while maintaining high modeling accuracy. Our results show that the proposed method effectively represents the electric potential profile above the lunar surface, even with limited data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825168
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling Lunar Surface Charging Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Daoru Han, Niloofar Zendehdel, Adib Mosharrof, K. Delgado et al.
Planetary Science and Exploration
article

Modeling Lunar Surface Charging Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Daoru Han, Niloofar Zendehdel, Adib Mosharrof, K. Delgado, Xin Liang, Tong Shu
article en

Abstract

Modeling the electric potential profile above the lunar surface is critical for understanding surface charging and interactions with the space environment. Traditional methods like Particle-in-Cell (PIC) simulations are highly accurate but computationally expensive. To address this, we propose a hybrid approach using a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) architecture in both data-driven neural networks and Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). The PINN component incorporates physical laws directly into the training process, ensuring physical consistency, while the data-driven component captures complex patterns. This combination offers a significant reduction in computational cost compared to PIC methods while maintaining high modeling accuracy. Our results show that the proposed method effectively represents the electric potential profile above the lunar surface, even with limited data.

University of North Texas (US), University of Kentucky (US), Missouri University of Science and Technology (US)
National Science Foundation, University of North Texas
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Planetary Science and Exploration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modeling Lunar Surface Charging Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks — Daoru Han, Niloofar Zendehdel, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS