Algorithmic Lending Bias: Evaluating the Fairness of Historical Redlining in Loan Approvals

This paper investigates the persistent influence of historical redlining on modern AI algorithms used in real estate and loan approvals. Utilizing Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data, we uncover demographic biases in loan approval processes and track their evolution over time. Through the application of machine learning models and the bias detection and mitigation toolkit, we assess fairness using metrics such as statistical parity difference, disparate impact, and the Theil Index. Our analysis demonstrates the existence of discrimination, and shows that mitigation techniques, such as reweighting and domain knowledge inclusion, can significantly reduce disparities and promote equity in loan approvals across race, gender, and ethnicity. This study also highlights the necessity of addressing historical biases in training data to foster fairer algorithmic decision-making, while proposing practical solutions for improving fairness in AI-based lending systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825978
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithmic Lending Bias: Evaluating the Fairness of Historical Redlining in Loan Approvals

Sheikh Rabiul Islam, Kuber Sarwal
1 citations
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
1.13
article

Algorithmic Lending Bias: Evaluating the Fairness of Historical Redlining in Loan Approvals

Sheikh Rabiul Islam, Kuber Sarwal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper investigates the persistent influence of historical redlining on modern AI algorithms used in real estate and loan approvals. Utilizing Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data, we uncover demographic biases in loan approval processes and track their evolution over time. Through the application of machine learning models and the bias detection and mitigation toolkit, we assess fairness using metrics such as statistical parity difference, disparate impact, and the Theil Index. Our analysis demonstrates the existence of discrimination, and shows that mitigation techniques, such as reweighting and domain knowledge inclusion, can significantly reduce disparities and promote equity in loan approvals across race, gender, and ethnicity. This study also highlights the necessity of addressing historical biases in training data to foster fairer algorithmic decision-making, while proposing practical solutions for improving fairness in AI-based lending systems.

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.