A Survey on Model-heterogeneous Federated Learning: Problems, Methods, and Prospects

As privacy concerns continue to grow, federated learning (FL) has gained significant attention as a promising privacy-preserving technology, leading to considerable advancements in recent years. Unlike traditional machine learning, which requires central data collection, FL keeps data localized on user devices. However, conventional FL assumes that all clients operate with identical model structures initialized by the server. In real-world applications, system heterogeneity is common, with clients possessing varying computational capabilities. This disparity can hinder training for resource-limited clients and result in inefficient resource use for those with greater processing power. To address this challenge, model-heterogeneous FL has been introduced, enabling clients to train models of varying complexity based on their hardware resources. This paper reviews state-of-the-art approaches in model-heterogeneous FL, analyzing their strengths and weaknesses, while identifying open challenges and future research directions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first survey to specifically focus on model-heterogeneous FL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825769
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Survey on Model-heterogeneous Federated Learning: Problems, Methods, and Prospects

Pan Hui, Siyang Jiang, Sasu Tarkoma, Boyu Fan et al.
7 citations
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
2.43
article

A Survey on Model-heterogeneous Federated Learning: Problems, Methods, and Prospects

Pan Hui, Siyang Jiang, Sasu Tarkoma, Boyu Fan, Xiang Su
article en
7 citations

Abstract

As privacy concerns continue to grow, federated learning (FL) has gained significant attention as a promising privacy-preserving technology, leading to considerable advancements in recent years. Unlike traditional machine learning, which requires central data collection, FL keeps data localized on user devices. However, conventional FL assumes that all clients operate with identical model structures initialized by the server. In real-world applications, system heterogeneity is common, with clients possessing varying computational capabilities. This disparity can hinder training for resource-limited clients and result in inefficient resource use for those with greater processing power. To address this challenge, model-heterogeneous FL has been introduced, enabling clients to train models of varying complexity based on their hardware resources. This paper reviews state-of-the-art approaches in model-heterogeneous FL, analyzing their strengths and weaknesses, while identifying open challenges and future research directions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first survey to specifically focus on model-heterogeneous FL.

University of Helsinki (FI), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Huizhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
2.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Survey on Model-heterogeneous Federated Learning: Problems, Methods, and Prospects — Pan Hui, Siyang Jiang, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS