Integrated Geophysical Search for 19th‐Century Underground Tanks in Krakow (Poland): Analysis of 2D, 2.5D and 3D ERT Surveys

ABSTRACT The paper presents the results of a noninvasive geophysical search for 19th‐century underground tanks located in the former Austrian imperial barracks complex of Archduke Rudolf in Krakow (Poland). The location of the tanks was necessary to assess their condition for safety reasons. Complementary geophysical methods in terms of field conditions and data acquisition, that is, magnetometry, ground penetrating radar (GPR) and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), were used to locate the tanks. Interdisciplinary surveys made it possible to identify the subsurface structure, locate sewage settling tanks and verify archival documentation. The paper presents the problems that arise in imaging underground structures using applied geophysical methods. The aim of the study was also to assess the effectiveness of these methods in subsurface identification, including 2D, 2.5D and 3D ERT surveys. The applied sequence of measurements (magnetometric, GPR and ERT) proved to be correct and the most effective. It allowed for narrowing down the research area. Magnetometric measurements allowed for the location of iron elements related to the construction of the tanks. GPR measurements determined their range. The ERT results showed that 2D and 2.5D surveys conducted in the parallel‐line arrangement are as effective in determining the location of an anomalous object as the 3D orthogonal‐line arrangement. The 3D method enabled the identification of additional anomalies not detected by the 2.5D method. From the point of view of the practicality of both techniques, the 2.5D method turned out to be better than the 3D method, due to the simplicity of the fieldwork, lower spatial and hardware requirements, a greater depth range and lower complexity of data acquisition and processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archaeological Prospection
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1974
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Geophysical Methods and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated Geophysical Search for 19th‐Century Underground Tanks in Krakow (Poland): Analysis of 2D, 2.5D and 3D ERT Surveys

Wiesław Nawrocki, Bernadetta Pasierb
3 citations
Archaeological Prospection
Geophysical Methods and Applications
3.44
article

Integrated Geophysical Search for 19th‐Century Underground Tanks in Krakow (Poland): Analysis of 2D, 2.5D and 3D ERT Surveys

Wiesław Nawrocki, Bernadetta Pasierb
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The paper presents the results of a noninvasive geophysical search for 19th‐century underground tanks located in the former Austrian imperial barracks complex of Archduke Rudolf in Krakow (Poland). The location of the tanks was necessary to assess their condition for safety reasons. Complementary geophysical methods in terms of field conditions and data acquisition, that is, magnetometry, ground penetrating radar (GPR) and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), were used to locate the tanks. Interdisciplinary surveys made it possible to identify the subsurface structure, locate sewage settling tanks and verify archival documentation. The paper presents the problems that arise in imaging underground structures using applied geophysical methods. The aim of the study was also to assess the effectiveness of these methods in subsurface identification, including 2D, 2.5D and 3D ERT surveys. The applied sequence of measurements (magnetometric, GPR and ERT) proved to be correct and the most effective. It allowed for narrowing down the research area. Magnetometric measurements allowed for the location of iron elements related to the construction of the tanks. GPR measurements determined their range. The ERT results showed that 2D and 2.5D surveys conducted in the parallel‐line arrangement are as effective in determining the location of an anomalous object as the 3D orthogonal‐line arrangement. The 3D method enabled the identification of additional anomalies not detected by the 2.5D method. From the point of view of the practicality of both techniques, the 2.5D method turned out to be better than the 3D method, due to the simplicity of the fieldwork, lower spatial and hardware requirements, a greater depth range and lower complexity of data acquisition and processing.

Archaeological ProspectionVol. 32(2)
Cracow University of Technology (PL)
Politechnika Krakowska
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Geophysical Methods and Applications
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Integrated Geophysical Search for 19th‐Century Underground Tanks in Krakow (Poland): Analysis of 2D, 2.5D and 3D ERT Surveys — Wiesław Nawrocki, Bernadetta Pasierb · Archaeological Prospection (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS