Fertilizer selection influences soil microbial communities in alluvial and peat soils of the tropics

Abstract Fertilizer choices can alter soil microbial communities. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of urea, chicken manure, and Azolla fertilizers on soil microbial communities in alluvial and peat soils in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Five nitrogen (N) fertilizer treatments were applied to spinach ( Amaranthus tricolor) grown on both soil types: control (0 kg N ha −1 ), urea (23 kg N ha −1 ), Azolla applied at the same urea‐N rate ( Azolla ‐U, 23 kg N ha −1 ), chicken manure (108 kg N ha −1 ), and Azolla applied at the same manure‐N rate ( Azolla ‐M, 108 kg N ha −1 ). Microbial community structure was determined from freeze‐dried soil samples (0–20 cm deep) by the ester‐linked fatty acid methyl ester (EL‐FAME) method and analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Treatment effects were dependent upon soil type. In peat soil, fertilizer treatment influenced the abundance of Gram‐positive bacteria, whereas in alluvial soil, fertilizer affected the population of Gram‐negative bacteria. In alluvial soil, Azolla ‐M increased EL‐FAMEs for total microbial biomass, Gram‐negative bacteria, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. On the other hand, in the peat soil, Azolla ‐M had a significant effect on altering the microbial community structure toward greater fungal biomass, while urea increased the number of Gram‐positive bacteria and actinomycetes. Azolla ‐M altered the Gram‐positive:Gram‐negative ratio and reduced the Stress 2 ratio in the peat soil, but the manure and the lower application of Azolla ( Azolla ‐U) did not. Azolla ‐M may diminish stress encountered by the microbial community from unfavorable environmental conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70040
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fertilizer selection influences soil microbial communities in alluvial and peat soils of the tropics

Dwi P. Widiastuti, Mary E. Stromberger, Jessica G. Davis, Sutarman Gafur et al.
1 citations
Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
1.72
article

Fertilizer selection influences soil microbial communities in alluvial and peat soils of the tropics

Dwi P. Widiastuti, Mary E. Stromberger, Jessica G. Davis, Sutarman Gafur, Antisar Afkairin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Fertilizer choices can alter soil microbial communities. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of urea, chicken manure, and Azolla fertilizers on soil microbial communities in alluvial and peat soils in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Five nitrogen (N) fertilizer treatments were applied to spinach ( Amaranthus tricolor) grown on both soil types: control (0 kg N ha −1 ), urea (23 kg N ha −1 ), Azolla applied at the same urea‐N rate ( Azolla ‐U, 23 kg N ha −1 ), chicken manure (108 kg N ha −1 ), and Azolla applied at the same manure‐N rate ( Azolla ‐M, 108 kg N ha −1 ). Microbial community structure was determined from freeze‐dried soil samples (0–20 cm deep) by the ester‐linked fatty acid methyl ester (EL‐FAME) method and analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Treatment effects were dependent upon soil type. In peat soil, fertilizer treatment influenced the abundance of Gram‐positive bacteria, whereas in alluvial soil, fertilizer affected the population of Gram‐negative bacteria. In alluvial soil, Azolla ‐M increased EL‐FAMEs for total microbial biomass, Gram‐negative bacteria, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. On the other hand, in the peat soil, Azolla ‐M had a significant effect on altering the microbial community structure toward greater fungal biomass, while urea increased the number of Gram‐positive bacteria and actinomycetes. Azolla ‐M altered the Gram‐positive:Gram‐negative ratio and reduced the Stress 2 ratio in the peat soil, but the manure and the lower application of Azolla ( Azolla ‐U) did not. Azolla ‐M may diminish stress encountered by the microbial community from unfavorable environmental conditions.

Agrosystems Geosciences & EnvironmentVol. 8(1)
Tanjungpura University (ID), National Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia (ID), National Research and Innovation Agency (ID), The Ohio State University (US), Colorado State University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Western SARE
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.