The Financial Reporting Consequences of Last Chance Earnings Management

ABSTRACT Given its opacity and the timing of its closure, the tax expense represents a theoretically and intuitively plausible mechanism for managers to manipulate earnings to achieve performance benchmarks (i.e., last chance earnings management or LCEM). Although empirical analyses of effective tax rates are consistent with the existence of this behavior, its consequences are unclear. We investigate whether LCEM is associated with lower financial reporting quality. Contrary to our expectations, we fail to find evidence that LCEM is associated with tax‐related misstatements, tax‐related comment letters, or tax accrual quality with scaled confidence intervals reliably near zero. In cross‐sectional tests, we also fail to find a consistent association in subsamples where LCEM is more likely to represent impaired financial reporting quality. Collectively, our results should caution researchers using LCEM as a proxy for impaired financial reporting quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Finance &amp Accounting
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12847
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Financial Reporting Consequences of Last Chance Earnings Management

Michael Mayberry, Scott G. Rane
Journal of Business Finance &amp Accounting
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

The Financial Reporting Consequences of Last Chance Earnings Management

Michael Mayberry, Scott G. Rane
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Given its opacity and the timing of its closure, the tax expense represents a theoretically and intuitively plausible mechanism for managers to manipulate earnings to achieve performance benchmarks (i.e., last chance earnings management or LCEM). Although empirical analyses of effective tax rates are consistent with the existence of this behavior, its consequences are unclear. We investigate whether LCEM is associated with lower financial reporting quality. Contrary to our expectations, we fail to find evidence that LCEM is associated with tax‐related misstatements, tax‐related comment letters, or tax accrual quality with scaled confidence intervals reliably near zero. In cross‐sectional tests, we also fail to find a consistent association in subsamples where LCEM is more likely to represent impaired financial reporting quality. Collectively, our results should caution researchers using LCEM as a proxy for impaired financial reporting quality.

Journal of Business Finance &amp AccountingVol. 52(3)
University of Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.