Disturbance from tillage is a dominant factor in explaining differences in soil biodiversity of three grasslands management types

Intensification of agriculture has reduced both aboveground and belowground biodiversity, as well as their ecosystem services. A transition towards regenerative agricultural systems is supposed to enhance functional agro-biodiversity and create more resilient systems. For dairy or beef farming, extensification towards semi-natural grasslands and establishing multi-species grasslands are potential contributors to this transition. Both grassland types differ in terms of plant diversity and management, but it is unclear whether and how these differences translate into soil quality and soil biodiversity. An on-farm trial was set up in which the abundance and diversity of soil biota was compared between intensively managed species-poor permanent grasslands, intensively managed frequently re-seeded multi-species grasslands, and extensively managed species-rich semi-natural grasslands. Total abundance and biomass of nematodes, micro-arthropods and earthworms did not differ between these grassland types. Bacterial PLFA was higher in semi-natural grasslands than in multi-species grasslands; intensive-permanent grasslands took an intermediate position. Protozoan PLFA was higher in intensive-permanent grasslands than in multi-species grasslands; semi-natural grasslands took an intermediate position. The grassland management types only had an effect on alpha and gamma diversity in the case of micro-arthropods, with a higher taxonomic richness in semi-natural grasslands. Nematode, micro-arthropod and earthworm taxonomic community structures differed between grassland management types. Differences in abundance and diversity of soil biota between multi-species grasslands on the one hand and intensive-permanent and semi-natural grasslands on the other hand were thought to be mostly related to disturbances caused by tillage and their direct and indirect effects on soil biota and its living conditions. Consequently, longevity without regular soil disturbance is considered important for the transition to grassland systems such as multi-species grasslands that simultaneously utilise and support soil biodiversity and its ecosystem services. However, what must also be considered in decisions on the transition to future farming systems are the impacts on aboveground biodiversity (including insects and birds) and ecosystem services such as agricultural production. • Soil biodiversity of three grassland management types was compared on-farm. • Differences in microbial PLFA but not in abundances of mesofauna and macrofauna. • Taxonomic community structure differed between grassland management types. • Disturbance from tillage seems a dominant factor in explaining differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Soil Ecology
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.105881
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.56

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disturbance from tillage is a dominant factor in explaining differences in soil biodiversity of three grasslands management types

Tim Visser, R.H.E.M. Geerts, Jaap Bloem, Anthonie Stip et al.
3 citations
Applied Soil Ecology
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
3.56
article

Disturbance from tillage is a dominant factor in explaining differences in soil biodiversity of three grasslands management types

Tim Visser, R.H.E.M. Geerts, Jaap Bloem, Anthonie Stip, Pedro Janssen, N.J.M. van Eekeren, R.G.M. de Goede, J. Dekker
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Intensification of agriculture has reduced both aboveground and belowground biodiversity, as well as their ecosystem services. A transition towards regenerative agricultural systems is supposed to enhance functional agro-biodiversity and create more resilient systems. For dairy or beef farming, extensification towards semi-natural grasslands and establishing multi-species grasslands are potential contributors to this transition. Both grassland types differ in terms of plant diversity and management, but it is unclear whether and how these differences translate into soil quality and soil biodiversity. An on-farm trial was set up in which the abundance and diversity of soil biota was compared between intensively managed species-poor permanent grasslands, intensively managed frequently re-seeded multi-species grasslands, and extensively managed species-rich semi-natural grasslands. Total abundance and biomass of nematodes, micro-arthropods and earthworms did not differ between these grassland types. Bacterial PLFA was higher in semi-natural grasslands than in multi-species grasslands; intensive-permanent grasslands took an intermediate position. Protozoan PLFA was higher in intensive-permanent grasslands than in multi-species grasslands; semi-natural grasslands took an intermediate position. The grassland management types only had an effect on alpha and gamma diversity in the case of micro-arthropods, with a higher taxonomic richness in semi-natural grasslands. Nematode, micro-arthropod and earthworm taxonomic community structures differed between grassland management types. Differences in abundance and diversity of soil biota between multi-species grasslands on the one hand and intensive-permanent and semi-natural grasslands on the other hand were thought to be mostly related to disturbances caused by tillage and their direct and indirect effects on soil biota and its living conditions. Consequently, longevity without regular soil disturbance is considered important for the transition to grassland systems such as multi-species grasslands that simultaneously utilise and support soil biodiversity and its ecosystem services. However, what must also be considered in decisions on the transition to future farming systems are the impacts on aboveground biodiversity (including insects and birds) and ecosystem services such as agricultural production. • Soil biodiversity of three grassland management types was compared on-farm. • Differences in microbial PLFA but not in abundances of mesofauna and macrofauna. • Taxonomic community structure differed between grassland management types. • Disturbance from tillage seems a dominant factor in explaining differences.

Applied Soil EcologyVol. 206
Dutch Butterfly Conservation (NL), Louis Bolk Instituut (NL), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Ketenorganisatie van de zuivelsector
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
3.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.