A Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Coding Education for Early Childhood Education

While the importance of coding education in early childhood education has recentlybeen emphasized, research comprehensively examining its effects remains limited. The purpose of this study is to systematically analyze the effects of coding education for early childhoodeducation through a meta-analysis. The study subjects are research articles published inKorean domestic journals (KCI listed) up to 2024. The research method used is ameta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines, and effect sizes (Hedges' g) were calculatedusing EXCEL and R programs. The results are as follows: First, the overall mean effect size(g) of coding education for early childhood education was 1.62, with pre-postexperimental-control group designs showing larger effect sizes than comparative studies basedon coding experience. Second, regarding effect sizes across cognitive, affective, andpsychomotor domains, the cognitive domain showed the largest effect, followed bypsychomotor and affective domains, with the cognitive domain showing statistical significance. Third, regarding program types, unplugged coding showed the largest effect size, followed bycoding robots and integrated programs, although differences between types were notstatistically significant. This study empirically verified that coding education for earlychildhood education demonstrates large positive effects overall. The study discussed the needfor careful interpretation considering potential publication bias and small sample sizes insubcategories, and suggested implications and future research directions for effectiveimplementation of coding education for early childhood education.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48033/jss.9.4.1
Primary Topic
Education and Learning Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Coding Education for Early Childhood Education

Sunhee Kim
Education and Learning Interventions
article

A Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Coding Education for Early Childhood Education

Sunhee Kim
article en

Abstract

While the importance of coding education in early childhood education has recentlybeen emphasized, research comprehensively examining its effects remains limited. The purpose of this study is to systematically analyze the effects of coding education for early childhoodeducation through a meta-analysis. The study subjects are research articles published inKorean domestic journals (KCI listed) up to 2024. The research method used is ameta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines, and effect sizes (Hedges' g) were calculatedusing EXCEL and R programs. The results are as follows: First, the overall mean effect size(g) of coding education for early childhood education was 1.62, with pre-postexperimental-control group designs showing larger effect sizes than comparative studies basedon coding experience. Second, regarding effect sizes across cognitive, affective, andpsychomotor domains, the cognitive domain showed the largest effect, followed bypsychomotor and affective domains, with the cognitive domain showing statistical significance. Third, regarding program types, unplugged coding showed the largest effect size, followed bycoding robots and integrated programs, although differences between types were notstatistically significant. This study empirically verified that coding education for earlychildhood education demonstrates large positive effects overall. The study discussed the needfor careful interpretation considering potential publication bias and small sample sizes insubcategories, and suggested implications and future research directions for effectiveimplementation of coding education for early childhood education.

Vol. 9(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Education and Learning Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.