Acceptance of aging-in-place technologies: The role of subjective age, subjective health, and care experiences

Technologies to support older people living at home are becoming more and more relevant, yet not all factors that influence their acceptance are researched in-depth. The objective of the present study was to investigate how subjective age, subjective health and experiences as caregiver or care receiver are associated with the current use and perceived usefulness of different aging-in-place technologies. The data were acquired through a representative survey conducted at the end of 2020 with 616 persons aged 40–98 in a trilingual Northern Italian province. Multivariate binary logistic and linear regression analyses showed that only subjective health (b = 0.41, p = .017) and experiences as a caregiver (b = 0.85, p = .001) are positively associated with the current use of aging-in-place technologies. The usefulness assessments of four aging-in-place technology scenarios were predicted by subjective age (b = -1.80, p = .046), subjective health (b = -0.34, p = .031) and experience as a caregiver (b = -0.95, p = .013 and b = -0.48, p = .030). The influencing role of subjective age on acceptance factors regarding aging-in-place technologies seems to be weaker than that of the two health-and care-related variables. Future research should further investigate how the acceptance of aging-in-place technologies varies with different levels of technical complexity, and the focus on health or caregiving, in order to help improve their integration into the lives of older adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Gerontology
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2025.2453188
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Technology Use by Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptance of aging-in-place technologies: The role of subjective age, subjective health, and care experiences

Ines Simbrig, Sonja Vigl, Josef Bernhart
2 citations
Educational Gerontology
Technology Use by Older Adults
11.18
article

Acceptance of aging-in-place technologies: The role of subjective age, subjective health, and care experiences

Ines Simbrig, Sonja Vigl, Josef Bernhart
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Technologies to support older people living at home are becoming more and more relevant, yet not all factors that influence their acceptance are researched in-depth. The objective of the present study was to investigate how subjective age, subjective health and experiences as caregiver or care receiver are associated with the current use and perceived usefulness of different aging-in-place technologies. The data were acquired through a representative survey conducted at the end of 2020 with 616 persons aged 40–98 in a trilingual Northern Italian province. Multivariate binary logistic and linear regression analyses showed that only subjective health (b = 0.41, p = .017) and experiences as a caregiver (b = 0.85, p = .001) are positively associated with the current use of aging-in-place technologies. The usefulness assessments of four aging-in-place technology scenarios were predicted by subjective age (b = -1.80, p = .046), subjective health (b = -0.34, p = .031) and experience as a caregiver (b = -0.95, p = .013 and b = -0.48, p = .030). The influencing role of subjective age on acceptance factors regarding aging-in-place technologies seems to be weaker than that of the two health-and care-related variables. Future research should further investigate how the acceptance of aging-in-place technologies varies with different levels of technical complexity, and the focus on health or caregiving, in order to help improve their integration into the lives of older adults.

Educational GerontologyVol. 51(10)
Eurac Research (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Technology Use by Older Adults
11.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.