Mouse and Touch Devices: On the Inuence of an Interaction's Direction onto its Performance

When building a Graphical User Interface, designers need to decide for the intended direction when moving from one interaction element to another. Tra ditionally this decision is often taken by following the writing direction of the intended users culture. That means, in Latin script a general left-to-right direc tion or in Arabic script, a right-to-left direction. The question is open whether this approach yields the best performance or if there are better suggestions for the choice of the general direction of the interaction. In this work, the results of a long-term experiment comparing mouse-based and touch-based interaction are presented. Especially, the inuence of the two dimensional direction of the interaction is investigated. The results reveal a di er ence between mouse-based and touch-based interactions: Whereas mouse-based interaction works best with diagonal and left-to-right movements, touch-based interaction prefers bottom-up and top-down movements and punishes left-to-right movements. For touch-based interaction, a mean difference in interaction times of as much as 10.8% between best and worst case were measured.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computación y Sistemas
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13053/cys-28-4-5303
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mouse and Touch Devices: On the Inuence of an Interaction's Direction onto its Performance

Beatriz A. González-Beltrán, Ulrich Bröckl
Computación y Sistemas
Design Education and Practice
article

Mouse and Touch Devices: On the Inuence of an Interaction's Direction onto its Performance

Beatriz A. González-Beltrán, Ulrich Bröckl
article en

Abstract

When building a Graphical User Interface, designers need to decide for the intended direction when moving from one interaction element to another. Tra ditionally this decision is often taken by following the writing direction of the intended users culture. That means, in Latin script a general left-to-right direc tion or in Arabic script, a right-to-left direction. The question is open whether this approach yields the best performance or if there are better suggestions for the choice of the general direction of the interaction. In this work, the results of a long-term experiment comparing mouse-based and touch-based interaction are presented. Especially, the inuence of the two dimensional direction of the interaction is investigated. The results reveal a di er ence between mouse-based and touch-based interactions: Whereas mouse-based interaction works best with diagonal and left-to-right movements, touch-based interaction prefers bottom-up and top-down movements and punishes left-to-right movements. For touch-based interaction, a mean difference in interaction times of as much as 10.8% between best and worst case were measured.

Computación y SistemasVol. 28(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.