Segmentation of Surface Electromyography Signals: A Comparative Analysis of Time and Frequency Domain Methods

This study evaluates the efficiency of computational segmentation methods in electromyographic (EMG) signal analysis across two distinct exercise sets. Twenty participants were engaged, performing a series of isometric and isotonic exercises. The first set included four isometric handgrip exercises, while the second set consisted of four isometric exercises with measured weights and two isotonic exercises with weights. Out of the total, 15 registries from the first set and 18 from the second set were considered valid. The segmentation methods assessed were RMS, Integral, Variance, Mean, and Entropy. Entropy, with a beta factor of 5, demonstrated the highest segmentation efficiency of 0.88 for the first set and 0.75 for the second. The findings highlight the potential of the Entropy method in enhancing the accuracy of EMG signal segmentation, which is crucial for the development of biomechanical models and rehabilitation protocols.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computación y Sistemas
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13053/cys-28-4-4874
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Segmentation of Surface Electromyography Signals: A Comparative Analysis of Time and Frequency Domain Methods

Ricardo Espinosa‐Tanguma, Omar Vital-Ochoa, Laura Espinosa, Jesús Acosta‐Elías et al.
Computación y Sistemas
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
article

Segmentation of Surface Electromyography Signals: A Comparative Analysis of Time and Frequency Domain Methods

Ricardo Espinosa‐Tanguma, Omar Vital-Ochoa, Laura Espinosa, Jesús Acosta‐Elías, Santiago Mendez-Moreno
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the efficiency of computational segmentation methods in electromyographic (EMG) signal analysis across two distinct exercise sets. Twenty participants were engaged, performing a series of isometric and isotonic exercises. The first set included four isometric handgrip exercises, while the second set consisted of four isometric exercises with measured weights and two isotonic exercises with weights. Out of the total, 15 registries from the first set and 18 from the second set were considered valid. The segmentation methods assessed were RMS, Integral, Variance, Mean, and Entropy. Entropy, with a beta factor of 5, demonstrated the highest segmentation efficiency of 0.88 for the first set and 0.75 for the second. The findings highlight the potential of the Entropy method in enhancing the accuracy of EMG signal segmentation, which is crucial for the development of biomechanical models and rehabilitation protocols.

Computación y SistemasVol. 28(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Segmentation of Surface Electromyography Signals: A Comparative Analysis of Time and Frequency Domain Methods — Ricardo Espinosa‐Tanguma, Omar Vital-Ochoa, et al. · Computación y Sistemas (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS