Understanding the formation of a low-pressure pedestal in the presence of a strong internal transport barrier in DIII-D high β<sub>p</sub> plasmas
Abstract As a promising scenario for fusion reactors, the high poloidal-beta ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>β</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>P</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) scenario is characterized by a strong large radius internal transport barrier (ITB), which significantly enhances the overall confinement quality and the bootstrap current fraction for fully non-inductive operation. It is frequently observed that in the presence of a strong ITB, the pedestal height is lower and is accompanied by small edge localized modes (ELMs), which further improves the compatibility of a high performance core with an edge solution. A mechanism for the formation of the low pedestal is proposed in this paper. It is found that the strong ITB creates an off-axis bootstrap current to clamp the local safety factor q , and thus the magnetic shear in the outer core/pedestal region is increased. Gyrokinetic simulations with the CGYRO code show that the higher magnetic shear brings the experimental profiles into the range where the growth rate of drift-wave instabilities and thus transport is higher, and therefore a lower pedestal gradient is expected. The combination of low pedestal and high magnetic shear further enhances the turbulent transport across the whole pedestal, consistent with power balance analysis. Such a positive feedback mechanism ultimately results in a lower pressure pedestal as observed in experiments. Under such a low pedestal, linear simulations with BOUT++ predict the growth rates of peeling–ballooning modes to be lower across the whole toroidal mode number spectra, and the nonlinear BOUT++ simulation exhibits lower saturated fluctuation intensity as well, consistent with the experimentally observed lower ELM size.
Authors
- V. S. Chan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3273-2663)
- Yanling Zhou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3484-3735)
- S. Ding (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1930-0439)
- Z.X. Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6494-2346)
- Yanli Zhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7683-5782)
- Zeyu Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3932-9244)
- Yunpeng Zou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3311-5931)
- Wei Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9382-6295)
- A. M. Garofalo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8244-2448)
- Xiaoran Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1943-8913)
- L.Z. Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7934-4848)
- Xiang Jian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3052-1694)
- Guoqiang Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0792-4348)
- Shu Zheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5170-1569)
Institutions
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Dalian University of Technology (CN)
- Institute of Plasma Physics (CN)
- Southwestern Institute of Physics (CN)
- General Atomics (United States) (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Nuclear Fusion
- Published
- 2025-01-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/adab07
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Magnetic confinement fusion research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.87
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Program of China
- Fusion Energy Sciences