PET-Based Risk Stratification in Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma: A Comparative Analysis of Different Segmentation Methods in the IELSG37 Trial Patient Cohort

Standardizing tumor measurement on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET is crucial for the routine clinical use of powerful PET-derived lymphoma prognostic factors such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). The recent proposal of an SUV of 4 as a new reference segmentation threshold for most aggressive lymphomas may homogenize volume-based metrics and facilitate their clinical application. <b>Methods:</b> This study compared MTV and TLG in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) patients estimated using an SUV of 4 and the current threshold at 25% of SUV<sub>max</sub> Baseline PET metrics were evaluated in 501 PMBCL patients from the IELSG37 trial. <b>Results:</b> Median MTV and TLG estimated with the 25% of SUV<sub>max</sub> threshold were significantly lower than those obtained with the new reference threshold; however, an extremely high correlation was observed between the methods for both MTV (<i>r</i> = 0.95) and TLG (<i>r</i> = 0.99), resulting in superimposable prognostic power. <b>Conclusion:</b> These findings support the routine use of an SUV of 4 for volumetric measurements in PMBCL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268874
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PET-Based Risk Stratification in Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma: A Comparative Analysis of Different Segmentation Methods in the IELSG37 Trial Patient Cohort

Peter Johnson, Lisa Milan, Luciano Cascione, Teresa Ruberto et al.
5 citations
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
7.36
article

PET-Based Risk Stratification in Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma: A Comparative Analysis of Different Segmentation Methods in the IELSG37 Trial Patient Cohort

Peter Johnson, Lisa Milan, Luciano Cascione, Teresa Ruberto, Luca Ceriani, Maria Cristina Pirosa, Giovannino Ciccone, Maurizio Martelli, Andrew Davies, Emanuele Zucca
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Standardizing tumor measurement on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET is crucial for the routine clinical use of powerful PET-derived lymphoma prognostic factors such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). The recent proposal of an SUV of 4 as a new reference segmentation threshold for most aggressive lymphomas may homogenize volume-based metrics and facilitate their clinical application. <b>Methods:</b> This study compared MTV and TLG in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) patients estimated using an SUV of 4 and the current threshold at 25% of SUV<sub>max</sub> Baseline PET metrics were evaluated in 501 PMBCL patients from the IELSG37 trial. <b>Results:</b> Median MTV and TLG estimated with the 25% of SUV<sub>max</sub> threshold were significantly lower than those obtained with the new reference threshold; however, an extremely high correlation was observed between the methods for both MTV (<i>r</i> = 0.95) and TLG (<i>r</i> = 0.99), resulting in superimposable prognostic power. <b>Conclusion:</b> These findings support the routine use of an SUV of 4 for volumetric measurements in PMBCL.

Journal of Nuclear MedicineVol. 66(2)
Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (CH), Institute of Oncology Research (CH), NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Piedmont Reference Center for Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention (IT), University of Southampton (GB), Istituto Imaging della Svizzera Italiana, Università della Svizzera italiana (CH), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Swiss Cancer Research Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
7.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.