A Method for Validating PET and SPECT Cameras for Quantitative Clinical Imaging Trials Using Novel Radionuclides

Our aim is to report methodology that has been developed to calibrate and verify PET and SPECT quantitative image accuracy and quality assurance for use with nonstandard radionuclides, especially with longer half-lives, in clinical imaging trials. <b>Methods:</b> Procedures have been developed for quantitative PET and SPECT image calibration for use in clinical trials. The protocol uses a 3-step approach: check quantitative accuracy with a previously calibrated radionuclide in a simple geometry, check the novel trial radionuclide in the same geometry, and check the novel radionuclide in a more challenging, complex geometry (the National Electrical Manufacturers Association [NEMA] NU-2 International Electrotechnical Commission [IEC] image-quality phantom). The radionuclides used in the trial as an example are <sup>124</sup>I (PET) and <sup>131</sup>I (SPECT). In both cases, whole-body tomographic SPECT and PET imaging with accompanying low-dose CT are required. PET accuracy is based on calibrating the dose calibrator to produce quantitative images for radionuclides other than <sup>18</sup>F, with all images reconstructed on each individual site's PET systems. For SPECT, an independent sensitivity measurement is made and then used to calibrate the SPECT images reconstructed at the core laboratory. After calibration, the final testing for both PET and SPECT uses the NEMA NU-2 IEC image-quality phantom to derive several metrics including quantitative accuracy based on an average SUV (SUV<sub>avg</sub>). <b>Results:</b> Using the method described, 7 sites in Australia have been qualified for 10 PET/CT scanners using <sup>124</sup>I imaging and 8 SPECT/CT systems for <sup>131</sup>I. One PET/CT system was found to give a result outside the specification of an SUV<sub>avg</sub> of 1.0 ± 0.05. All SPECT/CT systems gave an SUV<sub>avg</sub> accurate to within ±10% (SUV<sub>mean</sub>, 1.0 ± 0.1) of the true value for reconstructed radioactivity concentration in Bq/cm<sup>3</sup> <b>Conclusion:</b> A general methodology has been developed to calibrate and validate PET and SPECT systems for quantitative imaging in clinical trials. The preparation of the test objects and the procedures is relatively simple and can generally be implemented by the staff at the site of the imaging center with the equipment supplied by the clinical trials organization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268578
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Method for Validating PET and SPECT Cameras for Quantitative Clinical Imaging Trials Using Novel Radionuclides

George McGill, Kathy Willowson, Graeme O’Keefe, Steven J. Goodman et al.
3 citations
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
4.08
article

A Method for Validating PET and SPECT Cameras for Quantitative Clinical Imaging Trials Using Novel Radionuclides

George McGill, Kathy Willowson, Graeme O’Keefe, Steven J. Goodman, David A. Pattison, Shaun Patford, Andrew M. Scott, Dale L. Bailey
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Our aim is to report methodology that has been developed to calibrate and verify PET and SPECT quantitative image accuracy and quality assurance for use with nonstandard radionuclides, especially with longer half-lives, in clinical imaging trials. <b>Methods:</b> Procedures have been developed for quantitative PET and SPECT image calibration for use in clinical trials. The protocol uses a 3-step approach: check quantitative accuracy with a previously calibrated radionuclide in a simple geometry, check the novel trial radionuclide in the same geometry, and check the novel radionuclide in a more challenging, complex geometry (the National Electrical Manufacturers Association [NEMA] NU-2 International Electrotechnical Commission [IEC] image-quality phantom). The radionuclides used in the trial as an example are <sup>124</sup>I (PET) and <sup>131</sup>I (SPECT). In both cases, whole-body tomographic SPECT and PET imaging with accompanying low-dose CT are required. PET accuracy is based on calibrating the dose calibrator to produce quantitative images for radionuclides other than <sup>18</sup>F, with all images reconstructed on each individual site's PET systems. For SPECT, an independent sensitivity measurement is made and then used to calibrate the SPECT images reconstructed at the core laboratory. After calibration, the final testing for both PET and SPECT uses the NEMA NU-2 IEC image-quality phantom to derive several metrics including quantitative accuracy based on an average SUV (SUV<sub>avg</sub>). <b>Results:</b> Using the method described, 7 sites in Australia have been qualified for 10 PET/CT scanners using <sup>124</sup>I imaging and 8 SPECT/CT systems for <sup>131</sup>I. One PET/CT system was found to give a result outside the specification of an SUV<sub>avg</sub> of 1.0 ± 0.05. All SPECT/CT systems gave an SUV<sub>avg</sub> accurate to within ±10% (SUV<sub>mean</sub>, 1.0 ± 0.1) of the true value for reconstructed radioactivity concentration in Bq/cm<sup>3</sup> <b>Conclusion:</b> A general methodology has been developed to calibrate and validate PET and SPECT systems for quantitative imaging in clinical trials. The preparation of the test objects and the procedures is relatively simple and can generally be implemented by the staff at the site of the imaging center with the equipment supplied by the clinical trials organization.

Journal of Nuclear MedicineVol. 66(2)
The University of Sydney (AU), Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU), Royal North Shore Hospital (AU), Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU), Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre (AU), Austin Health (AU)
University of Technology Sydney, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
4.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.