МЕТОДОЛОГІЧНІ ЗАСАДИ ОЦІНКИ ЕФЕКТИВНОСТІ ІНСТИТУЦІЙНОГО ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ КЛІМАТИЧНОГО ФІНАНСУВАННЯ

Introduction. In increasing the effectiveness of climate financing, an important place belongs to a perfect methodology for assessing the effectiveness of its institutional provision. The significance of its development and implementation is due to numerous problems in the field of climate financing. At the same time, the accurate measurement of the effectiveness of initiatives for financing climate initiatives / programs / projects remains a difficult task due to the complexity of the distinction between purely climate financing and general financial assistance to countries, the multiplicity of sources of climate financing, the problems of accurately reflecting its financial flows and the imperfect system of their accounting and reporting. The purpose of the article. The purpose is to determine the methodological foundations for assessing the efficiency of institutional support for climate financing. Methods. The study uses a systematic approach, monographic and historical methods, methods of comparative and expert analysis. Results. The significance of developing methodological principles of institutional provision of climate financing is determined. The following types of efficiency of institutional support for climate finance are identified and characterized in view of its polymorphic nature: economic, social, environmental, energy efficiency, commercial marketing; allocative, organizational, managerial, functional; efficiency of measures taken within the framework of international climate requirements; efficiency of distribution of funds between areas/subjects/objects of program financing; primary and multiplicative efficiency, absolute and comparative, intermediate and final, real and calculated, strategic and tactical, actual and forecasted, static and dynamic, synergistic. The blocks of a comprehensive assessment of the efficiency of institutional support for climate finance are presented. The problems of assessing the efficiency of climate finance and its institutional support are clarified. The criteria and indicators of assessing the efficiency of institutional support for climate finance are presented. Conclusions. The methodology for assessing the effectiveness of institutional support for climate finance should focus on identifying / analyzing / assessing key areas / areas of institutional regulation, which will enable coordination of efforts to harmonize approaches / interests in combating / combating / mitigating / adapting to climate change / restoring / transforming. This in turn requires a clear understanding of the consequences of climate change / sources and procedures for climate finance / climate and related financial risks; perfect disclosure and reporting related to climate change, international cooperation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Economic journal of Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29038/2786-4618-2024-04-111-123
Primary Topic
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

МЕТОДОЛОГІЧНІ ЗАСАДИ ОЦІНКИ ЕФЕКТИВНОСТІ ІНСТИТУЦІЙНОГО ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ КЛІМАТИЧНОГО ФІНАНСУВАННЯ

Олена Щербакова
Economic journal of Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
article

МЕТОДОЛОГІЧНІ ЗАСАДИ ОЦІНКИ ЕФЕКТИВНОСТІ ІНСТИТУЦІЙНОГО ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ КЛІМАТИЧНОГО ФІНАНСУВАННЯ

Олена Щербакова
article en

Abstract

Introduction. In increasing the effectiveness of climate financing, an important place belongs to a perfect methodology for assessing the effectiveness of its institutional provision. The significance of its development and implementation is due to numerous problems in the field of climate financing. At the same time, the accurate measurement of the effectiveness of initiatives for financing climate initiatives / programs / projects remains a difficult task due to the complexity of the distinction between purely climate financing and general financial assistance to countries, the multiplicity of sources of climate financing, the problems of accurately reflecting its financial flows and the imperfect system of their accounting and reporting. The purpose of the article. The purpose is to determine the methodological foundations for assessing the efficiency of institutional support for climate financing. Methods. The study uses a systematic approach, monographic and historical methods, methods of comparative and expert analysis. Results. The significance of developing methodological principles of institutional provision of climate financing is determined. The following types of efficiency of institutional support for climate finance are identified and characterized in view of its polymorphic nature: economic, social, environmental, energy efficiency, commercial marketing; allocative, organizational, managerial, functional; efficiency of measures taken within the framework of international climate requirements; efficiency of distribution of funds between areas/subjects/objects of program financing; primary and multiplicative efficiency, absolute and comparative, intermediate and final, real and calculated, strategic and tactical, actual and forecasted, static and dynamic, synergistic. The blocks of a comprehensive assessment of the efficiency of institutional support for climate finance are presented. The problems of assessing the efficiency of climate finance and its institutional support are clarified. The criteria and indicators of assessing the efficiency of institutional support for climate finance are presented. Conclusions. The methodology for assessing the effectiveness of institutional support for climate finance should focus on identifying / analyzing / assessing key areas / areas of institutional regulation, which will enable coordination of efforts to harmonize approaches / interests in combating / combating / mitigating / adapting to climate change / restoring / transforming. This in turn requires a clear understanding of the consequences of climate change / sources and procedures for climate finance / climate and related financial risks; perfect disclosure and reporting related to climate change, international cooperation.

Economic journal of Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National UniversityVol. 4(40)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.