“What are you talking about? That is not true” — Men’s and women’s disagreements in English and Italianinteractions

Abstract The present research aims to uncover cross-linguistic differences (involving British English and Italian), as well as cross-gender differences (men and women) concerning use and preference of strategies and pragmatic modification, in verbal disagreements. The analysis of spontaneous conversations from the Spoken BNC2014 corpus ( McEnery et al. 2017 ), for the English sample, and from the KIParla corpus ( Goria and Mauri 2018 ), for the Italian sample, has brought to light divergences in the realization of disagreements, both at the cross-linguistic and at the cross-gender level. Methodologically speaking, models of analysis used for past empirical studies ( Muntigl and Turnbull 1998 ; Rees-Miller 2000 ; Johnson 2006 ; Paramasivam 2007 ) were drawn from for the annotation and codification of strategies and pragmatic modifiers. Results obtained from quantitative analyses are explained in the light of previous research findings, although the latter are partially disconfirmed and thus call for further future investigations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23038.nap
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“What are you talking about? That is not true” — Men’s and women’s disagreements in English and Italianinteractions

Vittorio Napoli
Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

“What are you talking about? That is not true” — Men’s and women’s disagreements in English and Italianinteractions

Vittorio Napoli
article en

Abstract

Abstract The present research aims to uncover cross-linguistic differences (involving British English and Italian), as well as cross-gender differences (men and women) concerning use and preference of strategies and pragmatic modification, in verbal disagreements. The analysis of spontaneous conversations from the Spoken BNC2014 corpus ( McEnery et al. 2017 ), for the English sample, and from the KIParla corpus ( Goria and Mauri 2018 ), for the Italian sample, has brought to light divergences in the realization of disagreements, both at the cross-linguistic and at the cross-gender level. Methodologically speaking, models of analysis used for past empirical studies ( Muntigl and Turnbull 1998 ; Rees-Miller 2000 ; Johnson 2006 ; Paramasivam 2007 ) were drawn from for the annotation and codification of strategies and pragmatic modifiers. Results obtained from quantitative analyses are explained in the light of previous research findings, although the latter are partially disconfirmed and thus call for further future investigations.

Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)Vol. 36(1)
University of Bologna (IT), University of Wales Trinity Saint David (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“What are you talking about? That is not true” — Men’s and women’s disagreements in English and Italianinteractions — Vittorio Napoli · Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS