Intersectional legal academy: Afterword to the Foreword by Gráinne de Búrca, Rosalind Dixon and Marcela Prieto Rudolphy

Abstract This Afterword to Gráinne de Búrca, Rosalind Dixon, and Marcela Prieto Rudolphy’s Foreword “Gender and the Legal Academy” picks up on and interrogates a point made by the authors—that a feminist legal academy is needed for gender equality in the academy. It shows that a truly feminist legal academy has to be intersectional, both normatively and practically. This has implications, as intersectionality necessarily excludes exclusive or limiting ideas of feminism. Whether a legal academy is able to embrace the full force of an intersectional legal academy depends on the context in which that academy is situated and the acceptance of intersectionality in that context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Constitutional Law
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moae086
Primary Topic
Discrimination and Equality Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersectional legal academy: Afterword to the Foreword by Gráinne de Búrca, Rosalind Dixon and Marcela Prieto Rudolphy

Shreya Atrey
International Journal of Constitutional Law
Discrimination and Equality Law
article

Intersectional legal academy: Afterword to the Foreword by Gráinne de Búrca, Rosalind Dixon and Marcela Prieto Rudolphy

Shreya Atrey
article en

Abstract

Abstract This Afterword to Gráinne de Búrca, Rosalind Dixon, and Marcela Prieto Rudolphy’s Foreword “Gender and the Legal Academy” picks up on and interrogates a point made by the authors—that a feminist legal academy is needed for gender equality in the academy. It shows that a truly feminist legal academy has to be intersectional, both normatively and practically. This has implications, as intersectionality necessarily excludes exclusive or limiting ideas of feminism. Whether a legal academy is able to embrace the full force of an intersectional legal academy depends on the context in which that academy is situated and the acceptance of intersectionality in that context.

International Journal of Constitutional LawVol. 22(4)
University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Discrimination and Equality Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.