A Method to Evaluate Orientation-Dependent Errors in the Center of Contrast Targets Used with Terrestrial Laser Scanners

Terrestrial laser scanners (TLS) are portable dimensional measurement instruments used to obtain 3D point clouds of objects in a scene. While TLSs do not require the use of cooperative targets, they are sometimes placed in a scene to fuse or compare data from different instruments or data from the same instrument but from different positions. A contrast target is an example of such a target; it consists of alternating black/white squares that can be printed using a laser printer. Because contrast targets are planar as opposed to three-dimensional (like a sphere), the center of the target might suffer from errors that depend on the orientation of the target with respect to the TLS. In this paper, we discuss a low-cost method to characterize such errors and present results obtained from a short-range TLS and a long-range TLS. Our method involves comparing the center of a contrast target against the center of spheres and, therefore, does not require the use of a reference instrument or calibrated objects. For the short-range TLS, systematic errors of up to 0.5 mm were observed in the target center as a function of the angle for the two distances (5 m and 10 m) and resolutions (30 points-per-degree (ppd) and 90 ppd) considered for this TLS. For the long-range TLS, systematic errors of about 0.3 mm to 0.8 mm were observed in the target center as a function of the angle for the two distances (5 m and 10 m) at low resolution (28 ppd). Errors of under 0.3 mm were observed in the target center as a function of the angle for the two distances at high resolution (109 ppd).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25020505
Citations
2
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Method to Evaluate Orientation-Dependent Errors in the Center of Contrast Targets Used with Terrestrial Laser Scanners

Braden Czapla, Mary Gregg, Bala Muralikrishnan, Meghan Shilling et al.
2 citations
Sensors
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
4.69
article

A Method to Evaluate Orientation-Dependent Errors in the Center of Contrast Targets Used with Terrestrial Laser Scanners

Braden Czapla, Mary Gregg, Bala Muralikrishnan, Meghan Shilling, Xinlin Lü
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Terrestrial laser scanners (TLS) are portable dimensional measurement instruments used to obtain 3D point clouds of objects in a scene. While TLSs do not require the use of cooperative targets, they are sometimes placed in a scene to fuse or compare data from different instruments or data from the same instrument but from different positions. A contrast target is an example of such a target; it consists of alternating black/white squares that can be printed using a laser printer. Because contrast targets are planar as opposed to three-dimensional (like a sphere), the center of the target might suffer from errors that depend on the orientation of the target with respect to the TLS. In this paper, we discuss a low-cost method to characterize such errors and present results obtained from a short-range TLS and a long-range TLS. Our method involves comparing the center of a contrast target against the center of spheres and, therefore, does not require the use of a reference instrument or calibrated objects. For the short-range TLS, systematic errors of up to 0.5 mm were observed in the target center as a function of the angle for the two distances (5 m and 10 m) and resolutions (30 points-per-degree (ppd) and 90 ppd) considered for this TLS. For the long-range TLS, systematic errors of about 0.3 mm to 0.8 mm were observed in the target center as a function of the angle for the two distances (5 m and 10 m) at low resolution (28 ppd). Errors of under 0.3 mm were observed in the target center as a function of the angle for the two distances at high resolution (109 ppd).

SensorsVol. 25(2)
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
4.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.