Interface Acoustic Waves in 128° YX-LiNbO3/SU-8/Overcoat Structures

The propagation of interface acoustic waves (IAWs) in 128° YX-LiNbO<sub>3</sub>/SU-8/overcoat structures was theoretically studied and experimentally investigated for different types of overcoat materials and thicknesses of the SU-8 adhesive layer. Three-dimensional finite element method analysis was performed using Comsol Multiphysics software to design an optimized multilayer configuration able to achieve an efficient guiding effect of the IAW at the LiNbO<sub>3</sub>/overcoat interface. Numerical analysis results showed the following: (i) an overcoat faster than the piezoelectric half-space ensures that the wave propagation is confined mainly close to the surface of the LiNbO<sub>3</sub>, although with minimal scattering in the overcoat; (ii) the presence of the SU-8, in addition to performing the essential function of an adhesive layer, can also promote the trapping of the acoustic energy toward the surface of the piezoelectric substrate; and (iii) the electromechanical coupling efficiency of the IAW is very close to that of the surface acoustic wave (SAW) along the bare LiNbO<sub>3</sub> half-space. The numerical predictions were experimentally assessed for some SU-8 layer thicknesses and overcoat material types. The propagation of the IAWs was experimentally measured in LiNbO<sub>3</sub>/SU-8/fused silica, LiNbO<sub>3</sub>/SU-8/(001)Si, and LiNbO<sub>3</sub>/SU-8/c-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> structures for an SU-8 layer about 15 µm thick; the velocities of the IAWs were found in good agreement with the theoretically calculated values. Although the interest in IAWs was born many years ago for packageless applications, it can currently be renewed if thought for applications in microfluidics. Indeed, the IAWs may represent a valid alternative to standing SAWs, which are strongly attenuated when travelling beneath the walls of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic channels for continuous flow particle manipulation, provided that the channel is excavated into the overcoating.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Micromachines
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16010099
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interface Acoustic Waves in 128° YX-LiNbO3/SU-8/Overcoat Structures

M. Benetti, Farouk Laidoudi, Cinzia Caliendo, Domenico Cannatà et al.
3 citations
Micromachines
Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
2.02
article

Interface Acoustic Waves in 128° YX-LiNbO3/SU-8/Overcoat Structures

M. Benetti, Farouk Laidoudi, Cinzia Caliendo, Domenico Cannatà, Gaetana Petrone
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The propagation of interface acoustic waves (IAWs) in 128° YX-LiNbO<sub>3</sub>/SU-8/overcoat structures was theoretically studied and experimentally investigated for different types of overcoat materials and thicknesses of the SU-8 adhesive layer. Three-dimensional finite element method analysis was performed using Comsol Multiphysics software to design an optimized multilayer configuration able to achieve an efficient guiding effect of the IAW at the LiNbO<sub>3</sub>/overcoat interface. Numerical analysis results showed the following: (i) an overcoat faster than the piezoelectric half-space ensures that the wave propagation is confined mainly close to the surface of the LiNbO<sub>3</sub>, although with minimal scattering in the overcoat; (ii) the presence of the SU-8, in addition to performing the essential function of an adhesive layer, can also promote the trapping of the acoustic energy toward the surface of the piezoelectric substrate; and (iii) the electromechanical coupling efficiency of the IAW is very close to that of the surface acoustic wave (SAW) along the bare LiNbO<sub>3</sub> half-space. The numerical predictions were experimentally assessed for some SU-8 layer thicknesses and overcoat material types. The propagation of the IAWs was experimentally measured in LiNbO<sub>3</sub>/SU-8/fused silica, LiNbO<sub>3</sub>/SU-8/(001)Si, and LiNbO<sub>3</sub>/SU-8/c-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> structures for an SU-8 layer about 15 µm thick; the velocities of the IAWs were found in good agreement with the theoretically calculated values. Although the interest in IAWs was born many years ago for packageless applications, it can currently be renewed if thought for applications in microfluidics. Indeed, the IAWs may represent a valid alternative to standing SAWs, which are strongly attenuated when travelling beneath the walls of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic channels for continuous flow particle manipulation, provided that the channel is excavated into the overcoating.

MicromachinesVol. 16(1)
Research Center in Industrial Technologies (DZ), Center for Biomolecular Nanotechnologies (IT), Institute for Microelectronics and Microsystems (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.