Limitations and Prospects for the Evolution of Russia’s Multiregional System

The specific features of the spatial development of the Russian economy in 2000–2020 are analyzed. In general, the territorial structure of the country’s economy has changed little, and the share of its Asian part has even decreased. It is shown that the summary characteristics of the economy have signs of macrostructural equilibrium in some metrics, largely due to the peculiarities of macroeconomic policy in the country. The development of individual regions and their associations does not have such characteristics. The article examines prospective changes in the spatial structure of the Russian Federation within three possible directions: the concept of a social state proposed by A.G. Aganbegyan; a set of new economic policy measures (NEP-2); selective evolution of the country’s multiregional system based on the generalization of the best regional practices. Using a cognitive model, the role, place, and functions of each participant in the regions–federal center–business structures system are analyzed, both individually and in particular relationships: federal center–business structures, business structures–regions, regions–federal center. Particular attention is paid to analysis of the possibilities for an equilibrium distribution of competencies and development resources between regions and the federal center, and the conditions for ensuring such opportunities are formulated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regional Research of Russia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s2079970524600550
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Limitations and Prospects for the Evolution of Russia’s Multiregional System

S. A. Suspitsyn
1 citations
Regional Research of Russia
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
1.13
article

Limitations and Prospects for the Evolution of Russia’s Multiregional System

S. A. Suspitsyn
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The specific features of the spatial development of the Russian economy in 2000–2020 are analyzed. In general, the territorial structure of the country’s economy has changed little, and the share of its Asian part has even decreased. It is shown that the summary characteristics of the economy have signs of macrostructural equilibrium in some metrics, largely due to the peculiarities of macroeconomic policy in the country. The development of individual regions and their associations does not have such characteristics. The article examines prospective changes in the spatial structure of the Russian Federation within three possible directions: the concept of a social state proposed by A.G. Aganbegyan; a set of new economic policy measures (NEP-2); selective evolution of the country’s multiregional system based on the generalization of the best regional practices. Using a cognitive model, the role, place, and functions of each participant in the regions–federal center–business structures system are analyzed, both individually and in particular relationships: federal center–business structures, business structures–regions, regions–federal center. Particular attention is paid to analysis of the possibilities for an equilibrium distribution of competencies and development resources between regions and the federal center, and the conditions for ensuring such opportunities are formulated.

Regional Research of RussiaVol. 14(4)
Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.