Can a mechanical circulatory support comprehensive approach to cardiogenic shock at referral centers reduce 30-day mortality?

Although mortality risk prediction in cardiogenic shock (CS) is possible, assessing the impact of the multitude of therapeutic efforts on outcomes is not straightforward. We assessed whether a temporary mechanical circulatory support comprehensive approach to the treatment of CS may reduce 30-day mortality as compared to expected mortality predicted by the recently proposed Cardiogenic Shock Score (CSS). Consecutive CS patients supported by pVAD Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) at two national referral centers were included. 170 patients were included: age was 65 ± 13 years, and 75.9% were male and acute myocardial infarction was the prevalent cause of shock (71.1%). Expected mortality according to CSS was higher than observed (51.8% vs. 41.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), this trend being particularly evident for CSS > 4. The AUC ROC curve confirmed poor diagnostic accuracy in this population (AUC 0.53 CI: 0.23-0.82, <i>p</i> = 0.83). The lower observed mortality compared to the expected mortality in critical cardiogenic shock population underscores the role of a comprehensive approach to acute cardiac care patients at referral centers, which should consider including temporary mechanical circulatory support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1509162
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can a mechanical circulatory support comprehensive approach to cardiogenic shock at referral centers reduce 30-day mortality?

Tommaso Sanna, Mario Iannaccone, Lazzaro Paraggio, Savino Altizio et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
0.67
article

Can a mechanical circulatory support comprehensive approach to cardiogenic shock at referral centers reduce 30-day mortality?

Tommaso Sanna, Mario Iannaccone, Lazzaro Paraggio, Savino Altizio, Marina Pieri, Luigi Cappannoli, Giulia Botti, Silvia Ajello, Enrico Romagnoli, Carlo Trani, Cristina Aurigemma, Francesco Burzotta, Anna Mara Scandroglio, Alaide Chieffo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although mortality risk prediction in cardiogenic shock (CS) is possible, assessing the impact of the multitude of therapeutic efforts on outcomes is not straightforward. We assessed whether a temporary mechanical circulatory support comprehensive approach to the treatment of CS may reduce 30-day mortality as compared to expected mortality predicted by the recently proposed Cardiogenic Shock Score (CSS). Consecutive CS patients supported by pVAD Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) at two national referral centers were included. 170 patients were included: age was 65 ± 13 years, and 75.9% were male and acute myocardial infarction was the prevalent cause of shock (71.1%). Expected mortality according to CSS was higher than observed (51.8% vs. 41.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), this trend being particularly evident for CSS > 4. The AUC ROC curve confirmed poor diagnostic accuracy in this population (AUC 0.53 CI: 0.23-0.82, <i>p</i> = 0.83). The lower observed mortality compared to the expected mortality in critical cardiogenic shock population underscores the role of a comprehensive approach to acute cardiac care patients at referral centers, which should consider including temporary mechanical circulatory support.

Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineVol. 11
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele (IT)
Abiomed
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.