Optimizing Recycling Processes for Mixed LFP/NMC Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Comparative Study of Acid-Excess and Acid-Deficient Leaching
This study explores the optimization of hydrometallurgical processes for recycling lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) containing a mixture of lithium iron phosphate (LFP) and nickel–manganese–cobalt (NMC) cathodes. Two approaches were investigated: acid-excess leaching and acid-deficient leaching with residue recirculation. A design of experiments (DoE) framework was applied to assess the impact of key parameters, including sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide concentrations, as well as solid-to-liquid (S/L) ratios, on the dissolution yields of target metals (Ni, Mn, Co, and Li). Acid-excess leaching achieved nearly complete dissolution of target metals but required additional purification steps to remove impurities. Acid-deficient leaching with a 60% recirculation of leaching residue improved dissolution yields by up to 12.5%, reduced reagent consumption, and minimized operational complexity. The study also evaluated separation strategies for manganese and cobalt through solvent extraction. Results indicate that while acid-excess leaching offers higher yields, acid-deficient leaching with residue recirculation is more cost-effective and environmentally friendly. These findings provide valuable insights for developing sustainable LIB recycling technologies.
Authors
- Alexandre Chagnes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4345-6812)
- Safi Jradi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1712-8986)
- Angélina Noclain (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6838-159X)
- Pierric Hubert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9376-9907)
Institutions
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Université de Technologie de Troyes (FR)
- Light, nanomaterials, nanotechnologies
- GeoRessources (FR)
- Université de Lorraine (FR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Metals
- Published
- 2025-01-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/met15010074
- Citations
- 6
- Primary Topic
- Extraction and Separation Processes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.28