PEGylated Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor and Plerixafor Enhance Autologous Stem and Progenitor Cell Mobilization and Transplantation in Pediatric Patients

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is used to restore bone marrow function after high-dose chemotherapy. For apheresis, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is standard of care, but obtaining sufficient stem cells can be challenging. Other mobilization agents include plerixafor and PEGylated G-CSF (PEG-G-CSF). While efficacy of these is established in adults, limited data for their use in pediatric patients are available. Here, we compare Good versus Poor Mobilizers and study success of different mobilization regimens in regard to CD34<sup>+</sup>cell-collection, -quality, -phenotype and hematologic reconstitution in pediatric patients. In this multi-center retrospective study, we analyzed data of 278 patients with solid tumors and lymphoma, mobilized with either G-CSF (<i>n</i> = 224), PEG-G-CSF (<i>n</i> = 34), or G-CSF/PEG-G-CSF with additional plerixafor (<i>n</i> = 20). In Poor Mobilizers (13.7% of all patients), addition of plerixafor to G-CSF augmented CD34<sup>+</sup>cell collection, without adverse effects on hematologic reconstitution and CD34<sup>+</sup>cell quality. PEG-G-CSF-aided mobilization was successful as first-line treatment in two-thirds of patients and did not impair hematological reconstitution, compared to G-CSF-only. Within the Poor Mobilizer group, G-CSF+plerixafor increased primitive (CD45RA<sup>-</sup>CD38<sup>-</sup>CD90<sup>+</sup>CD49f<sup>+</sup>) and CXCR4-expressing CD34<sup>+</sup>cells in apheresis products compared to G-CSF-only, without exceeding levels of Good Mobilizers. No plerixafor-related increase in tumor cells was observed in apheresis products. In conclusion, our comprehensive study supports the use of plerixafor and furthermore demonstrates the potential of patient-friendly PEG-G-CSF for mobilization of pediatric patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stem Cells and Development
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2024.0178
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PEGylated Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor and Plerixafor Enhance Autologous Stem and Progenitor Cell Mobilization and Transplantation in Pediatric Patients

Nina Y. Kunze, Marta Fiocco, Ilse Timmerman, C. Michel Zwaan et al.
2 citations
Stem Cells and Development
Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
2.78
article

PEGylated Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor and Plerixafor Enhance Autologous Stem and Progenitor Cell Mobilization and Transplantation in Pediatric Patients

Nina Y. Kunze, Marta Fiocco, Ilse Timmerman, C. Michel Zwaan, Miranda P. Dierselhuis, Nina U. Gelineau, Carlijn Kuijk, Kasper Westinga, Carlijn Voermans, Kathelijne C.J.M. Kraal, Wim J. E. Tissing, Tirza J. E. Slager, József Zsíros, Caroline Hochheuser, Cor van den Bos, Godelieve A.M. Tytgat, Maria L. Rozeman, Antoinette Jaspers-Bakker
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is used to restore bone marrow function after high-dose chemotherapy. For apheresis, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is standard of care, but obtaining sufficient stem cells can be challenging. Other mobilization agents include plerixafor and PEGylated G-CSF (PEG-G-CSF). While efficacy of these is established in adults, limited data for their use in pediatric patients are available. Here, we compare Good versus Poor Mobilizers and study success of different mobilization regimens in regard to CD34<sup>+</sup>cell-collection, -quality, -phenotype and hematologic reconstitution in pediatric patients. In this multi-center retrospective study, we analyzed data of 278 patients with solid tumors and lymphoma, mobilized with either G-CSF (<i>n</i> = 224), PEG-G-CSF (<i>n</i> = 34), or G-CSF/PEG-G-CSF with additional plerixafor (<i>n</i> = 20). In Poor Mobilizers (13.7% of all patients), addition of plerixafor to G-CSF augmented CD34<sup>+</sup>cell collection, without adverse effects on hematologic reconstitution and CD34<sup>+</sup>cell quality. PEG-G-CSF-aided mobilization was successful as first-line treatment in two-thirds of patients and did not impair hematological reconstitution, compared to G-CSF-only. Within the Poor Mobilizer group, G-CSF+plerixafor increased primitive (CD45RA<sup>-</sup>CD38<sup>-</sup>CD90<sup>+</sup>CD49f<sup>+</sup>) and CXCR4-expressing CD34<sup>+</sup>cells in apheresis products compared to G-CSF-only, without exceeding levels of Good Mobilizers. No plerixafor-related increase in tumor cells was observed in apheresis products. In conclusion, our comprehensive study supports the use of plerixafor and furthermore demonstrates the potential of patient-friendly PEG-G-CSF for mobilization of pediatric patients.

Stem Cells and DevelopmentVol. 34(3-4)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Sanquin (NL), Emma Kinderziekenhuis (NL), Princess Máxima Center (NL), Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Stichting Kinderen Kankervrij
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.