Police Involvement in Corruption Crime Investigations

Various rules and regulations enacted to replace prior legislation have not ensured success in combating corruption in Indonesia. The existence of several laws governing the authority and obligations of each law enforcement officer, such as the police, prosecutors, judges, and the Corruption Eradication Committee (KPK), has resulted in ambiguity in their authority or over-lapping authority granted by the state, creating a false perception. For example, the police as investigators believe they are authorized to investigate corruption cases in addition to prosecutors and the KPK. This research focuses on two issues. The first is what is the role of the police in in-vestigating corruption cases? And the second question is what procedures do the police carry out in investigating corruption crimes? The findings show that there has been no cooperation in the form of laws and regulations between police investigators and other law enforcement agencies such as the Prosecutor's Office and the KPK, so it is urgent that a law be enacted that clearly and in detail regulates the authority, cooperation, and coordination in investigating corruption, so that it becomes more effective and can be implemented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JIHAD Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v6i4.7537
Primary Topic
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Police Involvement in Corruption Crime Investigations

I Putu Edi Rusmana
JIHAD Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
article

Police Involvement in Corruption Crime Investigations

I Putu Edi Rusmana
article en

Abstract

Various rules and regulations enacted to replace prior legislation have not ensured success in combating corruption in Indonesia. The existence of several laws governing the authority and obligations of each law enforcement officer, such as the police, prosecutors, judges, and the Corruption Eradication Committee (KPK), has resulted in ambiguity in their authority or over-lapping authority granted by the state, creating a false perception. For example, the police as investigators believe they are authorized to investigate corruption cases in addition to prosecutors and the KPK. This research focuses on two issues. The first is what is the role of the police in in-vestigating corruption cases? And the second question is what procedures do the police carry out in investigating corruption crimes? The findings show that there has been no cooperation in the form of laws and regulations between police investigators and other law enforcement agencies such as the Prosecutor's Office and the KPK, so it is urgent that a law be enacted that clearly and in detail regulates the authority, cooperation, and coordination in investigating corruption, so that it becomes more effective and can be implemented.

JIHAD Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan AdministrasiVol. 6(4)
University of National Education (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Police Involvement in Corruption Crime Investigations — I Putu Edi Rusmana · JIHAD Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS