The impact of group coaching on the self-efficacy, test anxiety and perceived stress in male adolescents

One-to-one coaching interventions have had a demonstrably positive impact on the psychological wellbeing of young people but are beyond the resources of many schools. By contrast, group coaching has received little investigation and may be more feasible and offer similar benefits. This study sought to examine the effectiveness of group coaching to decrease test anxiety and perceived stress and increase self-efficacy amongst male students attending an English secondary school. In a quasi-experimental between-participant design, 32 male students between 16 and 18 years of age were allocated to a group coaching programme (n=16) or a wait-list control group (n=16) based on existing class membership. The six-week group coaching programme was structured around the GROW coaching model and was facilitated by a teacher-researcher trained in coaching psychology techniques. ANCOVA analyses indicate that group coaching had no statistically significant effect on self-efficacy or perceived stress, despite improved post-intervention mean scale scores for both measures. The coaching group experienced a significant increase in test anxiety whereas the control group demonstrated improved post-intervention scores against this measure. Findings did not attest to a significantly positive impact for group coaching. Further research is recommended to determine the potentially detrimental effects of group coaching against certain measures and which wellbeing measures may be enhanced in adolescents as effectively as using traditional one-to-one coaching.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Coaching Psychologist
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53841/bpstcp.2024.20.2.14
Primary Topic
Child Therapy and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of group coaching on the self-efficacy, test anxiety and perceived stress in male adolescents

Mary-Jane Budd, Jack Cranston
The Coaching Psychologist
Child Therapy and Development
article

The impact of group coaching on the self-efficacy, test anxiety and perceived stress in male adolescents

Mary-Jane Budd, Jack Cranston
article en

Abstract

One-to-one coaching interventions have had a demonstrably positive impact on the psychological wellbeing of young people but are beyond the resources of many schools. By contrast, group coaching has received little investigation and may be more feasible and offer similar benefits. This study sought to examine the effectiveness of group coaching to decrease test anxiety and perceived stress and increase self-efficacy amongst male students attending an English secondary school. In a quasi-experimental between-participant design, 32 male students between 16 and 18 years of age were allocated to a group coaching programme (n=16) or a wait-list control group (n=16) based on existing class membership. The six-week group coaching programme was structured around the GROW coaching model and was facilitated by a teacher-researcher trained in coaching psychology techniques. ANCOVA analyses indicate that group coaching had no statistically significant effect on self-efficacy or perceived stress, despite improved post-intervention mean scale scores for both measures. The coaching group experienced a significant increase in test anxiety whereas the control group demonstrated improved post-intervention scores against this measure. Findings did not attest to a significantly positive impact for group coaching. Further research is recommended to determine the potentially detrimental effects of group coaching against certain measures and which wellbeing measures may be enhanced in adolescents as effectively as using traditional one-to-one coaching.

The Coaching PsychologistVol. 20(2)
University of East London (GB), IEEE Computer Society (US), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Child Therapy and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.