Computed Tomography vs Computer Modeling for Comparison and Evaluation of Anatomical Features of the Radial Head

Background. The generally accepted method of treating complex radial head fractures is arthroplasty. At the present stage, there is a variety of prosthetic designs, in production of which statistically averaged morphometric parameters are used. The anthropometric features of patients are not taken into account. The aim of the study — to compare the morphometric parameters of the proximal radius obtained using computed tomography and computer modeling. Methods. The study used the radiological method of examination and the computer modeling method. The study material was a database of DICOM format computer tomograms of the right and left elbow joints of 137 people (66 males, 71 females). Their age ranged from 40 to 70 years, without signs of musculoskeletal system pathology. Computer tomograms were analyzed using the RadiAnt DICOM Viewer program. Computer modeling was carried out through the ITK-SNAP program (GNU General Public License version 3.0 — GPLv3), with further processing of the obtained model using the developed software method. Results. Comparison of the morphometric parameters of the radial head obtained using the developed computer modeling program and the morphometric parameters of a standard computed tomogram showed their identity. Conclusion. The presented software program “Automated determination of bone morphometric parameters” will enable to model the radial head prosthesis on the basis of indicators of computer tomograms, taking into account the individual structural features of the patient’s radius.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17816/2311-2905-17599
Primary Topic
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computed Tomography vs Computer Modeling for Comparison and Evaluation of Anatomical Features of the Radial Head

A. O. Samokhina, K. A. Egiazaryan, A. P. Ratyev, S. E. Shemyakov
Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
article

Computed Tomography vs Computer Modeling for Comparison and Evaluation of Anatomical Features of the Radial Head

A. O. Samokhina, K. A. Egiazaryan, A. P. Ratyev, S. E. Shemyakov
article en

Abstract

Background. The generally accepted method of treating complex radial head fractures is arthroplasty. At the present stage, there is a variety of prosthetic designs, in production of which statistically averaged morphometric parameters are used. The anthropometric features of patients are not taken into account. The aim of the study — to compare the morphometric parameters of the proximal radius obtained using computed tomography and computer modeling. Methods. The study used the radiological method of examination and the computer modeling method. The study material was a database of DICOM format computer tomograms of the right and left elbow joints of 137 people (66 males, 71 females). Their age ranged from 40 to 70 years, without signs of musculoskeletal system pathology. Computer tomograms were analyzed using the RadiAnt DICOM Viewer program. Computer modeling was carried out through the ITK-SNAP program (GNU General Public License version 3.0 — GPLv3), with further processing of the obtained model using the developed software method. Results. Comparison of the morphometric parameters of the radial head obtained using the developed computer modeling program and the morphometric parameters of a standard computed tomogram showed their identity. Conclusion. The presented software program “Automated determination of bone morphometric parameters” will enable to model the radial head prosthesis on the basis of indicators of computer tomograms, taking into account the individual structural features of the patient’s radius.

Traumatology and Orthopedics of RussiaVol. 31(1)
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Computed Tomography vs Computer Modeling for Comparison and Evaluation of Anatomical Features of the Radial Head — A. O. Samokhina, K. A. Egiazaryan, et al. · Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS