Comparative Analyses of Antiviral Potencies of Second-Generation Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors (INSTIs) and the Developmental Compound 4d Against a Panel of Integrase Quadruple Mutants

Second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are strongly recommended for people living with HIV-1 (PLWH). The emergence of resistance to second-generation INSTIs has been infrequent and has not yet been a major issue in high-income countries. However, the delayed rollouts of these INSTIs in low- to middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic combined with increased transmission of drug-resistant mutants worldwide are leading to an increase in INSTI resistance. Herein, we evaluated the antiviral potencies of our lead developmental INSTI 4d and the second-generation INSTIs dolutegravir (DTG), bictegravir (BIC), and cabotegravir (CAB) against a panel of IN quadruple mutants. The mutations are centered around G140S/Q148H, including positions L74, E92, and T97 combined with E138A/K/G140S/Q148H. All of the tested INSTIs lose potency against these IN quadruple mutants compared with the wild-type IN. In single-round infection assays, compound 4d retained higher antiviral potencies (EC₅₀ values) than second-generation INSTIs against a subset of quadruple mutants. These findings may advance understanding of mechanisms that contribute to resistance and, in so doing, facilitate development of new INSTIs with improved antiviral profiles.