How do Spanish consumers perceive different lettuce cultivation systems? Insights from explicit and implicit methods

• Investigates Spanish consumers’ perceptions of different agriculture methods. • Case study with lettuce identified local/small farmers as most positively evaluated. • Lettuces from urban community gardens were perceived less safe. • Vertical, greenhouse, and industrial farming linked to less tasty, healthy and sustainable lettuces. • Emotional response from facial coding was low but revealed a surprise reaction to vertical indoor. This study explores consumer perceptions of different agricultural systems to understand why some are regarded more favourably than others are. Five agricultural systems were compared in the context of lettuce cultivation: vertical indoor agriculture, small-scale local agriculture (local/small), high-tech greenhouses, urban community gardens, and industrial agriculture. Given the lack of knowledge among consumers about agricultural production, images and brief descriptions of the different systems were used as research stimuli. Explicit and implicit responses (as determined by eye tracking and facial coding) were recorded from 105 Spanish consumers. Local/small agriculture was the most favourably regarded of all aspects under consideration. Urban community gardens were the second most positively evaluated of the five agricultural systems; however, lettuce produced in this system was perceived as less safe to eat. Conversely, lettuce cultivated in high-tech greenhouses is regarded as safer to consume, yet this method of agriculture is also perceived as less sustainable. The emotional response was characterised by low intensity, with a notable exception in the case of vertical indoor farming, which elicited a stronger surprise reaction due to the limited familiarity of consumers with this farming system. Further research should include additional perceptions, such as naturalness and freshness, and analyse individual consumer responses to identify further differences among agricultural systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Food Research
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2025.100709
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Organic Food and Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do Spanish consumers perceive different lettuce cultivation systems? Insights from explicit and implicit methods

Patricia Puerta, Juan Diego Torres, Sara R. Jaeger, Amparo Tárrega
5 citations
Applied Food Research
Organic Food and Agriculture
8.75
article

How do Spanish consumers perceive different lettuce cultivation systems? Insights from explicit and implicit methods

Patricia Puerta, Juan Diego Torres, Sara R. Jaeger, Amparo Tárrega
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Investigates Spanish consumers’ perceptions of different agriculture methods. • Case study with lettuce identified local/small farmers as most positively evaluated. • Lettuces from urban community gardens were perceived less safe. • Vertical, greenhouse, and industrial farming linked to less tasty, healthy and sustainable lettuces. • Emotional response from facial coding was low but revealed a surprise reaction to vertical indoor. This study explores consumer perceptions of different agricultural systems to understand why some are regarded more favourably than others are. Five agricultural systems were compared in the context of lettuce cultivation: vertical indoor agriculture, small-scale local agriculture (local/small), high-tech greenhouses, urban community gardens, and industrial agriculture. Given the lack of knowledge among consumers about agricultural production, images and brief descriptions of the different systems were used as research stimuli. Explicit and implicit responses (as determined by eye tracking and facial coding) were recorded from 105 Spanish consumers. Local/small agriculture was the most favourably regarded of all aspects under consideration. Urban community gardens were the second most positively evaluated of the five agricultural systems; however, lettuce produced in this system was perceived as less safe to eat. Conversely, lettuce cultivated in high-tech greenhouses is regarded as safer to consume, yet this method of agriculture is also perceived as less sustainable. The emotional response was characterised by low intensity, with a notable exception in the case of vertical indoor farming, which elicited a stronger surprise reaction due to the limited familiarity of consumers with this farming system. Further research should include additional perceptions, such as naturalness and freshness, and analyse individual consumer responses to identify further differences among agricultural systems.

Applied Food ResearchVol. 5(1)
Aarhus University (DK), Universidad de Antioquia (CO), Institute of Food Science and Technology (CN), Agro Business Park (DK), Instituto de Agroquímica y Tecnología de Alimentos (ES)
EIT Food
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Organic Food and Agriculture
8.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.