Methodological Considerations When Studying Resistance-Trained Populations: Ideas for Using Control Groups

Hammert, WB, Dankel, SJ, Kataoka, R, Yamada, Y, Kassiano, W, Song, JS, and Loenneke, JP. Methodological considerations when studying resistance-trained populations: Ideas for using control groups. J Strength Cond Res 38(12): 2164-2171, 2024-The applicability of training effects from experimental research depends on the ability to quantify the degree of measurement error accurately over time, which can be accounted for by including a time-matched nonexercise control group. Yet, control groups are rarely included in studies on resistance-trained individuals. Many authors instead report short-term relative or absolute measures of reliability for the interpretation of statistical tests and the size or meaning of effects observed and assume that good short-term reliability justifies the lack of a control group. In this article, we offer some potential alternatives for employing control groups in research studies on resistance-trained individuals. We wish to suggest researchers consider using a "time-matched training group" (i.e., resistance-trained individuals who keep an exercise log, continue their normal training, and perform the pre- and posttest measures spanning the same duration as that of the exercise group or groups) and/or a time-matched nonexercise control group (i.e., non-resistance-trained individuals who perform only the pre- and posttest measures spanning the same duration as that of the exercise training group or groups). If it is not feasible (e.g., researchers do not wish to randomly assign individuals to a time-matched training group or include a time-matched nonexercise control group) to employ such designs, or relevant, then an alternative approach might be to include a run-in (i.e., control) period that spans the same duration as the exercise training intervention. Our hope is that this article can help strengthen future research designs conducted on resistance-trained individuals.