Implicit knowledge-augmented prompting for commonsense explanation generation

Abstract Commonsense explanation generation refers to reasoning and explaining why a commonsense statement contradicts commonsense knowledge, such as why the statement “My dad grew volleyballs in his garden” is nonsensical. While such reasoning is trivial for humans, it remains a challenge for AI systems. Despite their notable performance in tasks like text generation and reasoning, large language models (LLMs) often fall short of consistently generating coherent and accurate commonsense explanations. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel Two-stage Identification and Prompting (TIP) framework for enhancing LLMs’ ability to handle the task of commonsense explanation generation. Specifically, in the first stage, TIP identifies the nonsensical concept in the given statement, pinpointing the specific element that contradicts commonsense knowledge. In the second stage, TIP generates implicit knowledge based on the identified nonsensical concept and then leverages this implicit knowledge to guide the adopted LLMs in generating explanations. In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed TIP framework for commonsense explanation generation, we conducted extensive experiments based on the ComVE dataset and a newly constructed CSE dataset, where a variety of LLMs are evaluated. The experimental results show that TIP consistently outperforms all baseline methods across multiple metrics, demonstrating its effectiveness in improving LLMs’ commonsense reasoning and explanation generation capabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge and Information Systems
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-024-02326-w
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implicit knowledge-augmented prompting for commonsense explanation generation

Akiyoshi Matono, Xin Liu, Kyoung‐Sook Kim, Steven Lynden et al.
4 citations
Knowledge and Information Systems
Topic Modeling
9.92
article

Implicit knowledge-augmented prompting for commonsense explanation generation

Akiyoshi Matono, Xin Liu, Kyoung‐Sook Kim, Steven Lynden, Adam Jatowt, Chao Lei, Hai-Tao Yu, Yan Ge
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Commonsense explanation generation refers to reasoning and explaining why a commonsense statement contradicts commonsense knowledge, such as why the statement “My dad grew volleyballs in his garden” is nonsensical. While such reasoning is trivial for humans, it remains a challenge for AI systems. Despite their notable performance in tasks like text generation and reasoning, large language models (LLMs) often fall short of consistently generating coherent and accurate commonsense explanations. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel Two-stage Identification and Prompting (TIP) framework for enhancing LLMs’ ability to handle the task of commonsense explanation generation. Specifically, in the first stage, TIP identifies the nonsensical concept in the given statement, pinpointing the specific element that contradicts commonsense knowledge. In the second stage, TIP generates implicit knowledge based on the identified nonsensical concept and then leverages this implicit knowledge to guide the adopted LLMs in generating explanations. In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed TIP framework for commonsense explanation generation, we conducted extensive experiments based on the ComVE dataset and a newly constructed CSE dataset, where a variety of LLMs are evaluated. The experimental results show that TIP consistently outperforms all baseline methods across multiple metrics, demonstrating its effectiveness in improving LLMs’ commonsense reasoning and explanation generation capabilities.

Knowledge and Information SystemsVol. 67(4)
University of Tsukuba (JP), Universität Innsbruck (AT), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (JP)
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Topic Modeling
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.