Are we ready for the next pandemic? Public preferences and trade-offs between vaccine characteristics and societal restrictions across 21 countries

In vaccination decisions, individuals must weigh the benefits against the risks of remaining unvaccinated and potentially facing social restrictions. Previous studies have focused on individual preferences for vaccine characteristics and societal restrictions separately. This study aims to quantify public preferences and the potential trade-offs between vaccine characteristics and societal restrictions, including lockdowns and vaccine mandates, in the context of a future pandemic. We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) involving 47,114 respondents from 21 countries between July 2022 and June 2023 through an online panel. Participants were presented with choices between two hypothetical vaccination programs and an option to opt-out. A latent class logit model was used to estimate trade-offs among attributes. Despite some level of preference heterogeneity across countries and respondents' profiles, we consistently identified three classes of respondents: vaccine refusers, vaccine-hesitant, and pro-vaccine individuals. Vaccine attributes were generally deemed more important than societal restriction attributes. We detected strong preferences for the highest levels of vaccine effectiveness and for domestically produced vaccines across most countries. Being fully vaccinated against COVID-19 was the strongest predictor of pro-vaccine class preferences. Women and younger people were more likely to be vaccine refusers compared to men and older individuals. In some countries, vaccine hesitancy and refusal were linked to lower socioeconomic status, whereas in others, individuals with higher education and higher income were more likely to exhibit hesitancy. Our findings emphasize the need for tailored vaccination programs that consider local contexts and demographics. Building trust in national regulatory authorities and international organizations through targeted communication, along with investing in domestic production facilities, can improve vaccine uptake and enhance public health responses in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117687
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are we ready for the next pandemic? Public preferences and trade-offs between vaccine characteristics and societal restrictions across 21 countries

Marcello Antonini, Aleksandra Torbica, Ana Rita Sequeira, Adrian Kellner et al.
12 citations
Social Science & Medicine
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
26.01
article

Are we ready for the next pandemic? Public preferences and trade-offs between vaccine characteristics and societal restrictions across 21 countries

Marcello Antonini, Aleksandra Torbica, Ana Rita Sequeira, Adrian Kellner, Terje P. Hagen, Zsolt J. Balogh, Neil McGregor, Shuli Brammli‐Greenberg, Chiara Berardi, Francesco Paolucci, Daiga Behmane, Alessia Melegaro, Madeleine Hinwood, Liubovė Murauskienė, Brian Kelly, Katie Attwell, Arthur E. Attema, Mesfin G. Genie, Jeremy K. Ward
article en
12 citations

Abstract

In vaccination decisions, individuals must weigh the benefits against the risks of remaining unvaccinated and potentially facing social restrictions. Previous studies have focused on individual preferences for vaccine characteristics and societal restrictions separately. This study aims to quantify public preferences and the potential trade-offs between vaccine characteristics and societal restrictions, including lockdowns and vaccine mandates, in the context of a future pandemic. We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) involving 47,114 respondents from 21 countries between July 2022 and June 2023 through an online panel. Participants were presented with choices between two hypothetical vaccination programs and an option to opt-out. A latent class logit model was used to estimate trade-offs among attributes. Despite some level of preference heterogeneity across countries and respondents' profiles, we consistently identified three classes of respondents: vaccine refusers, vaccine-hesitant, and pro-vaccine individuals. Vaccine attributes were generally deemed more important than societal restriction attributes. We detected strong preferences for the highest levels of vaccine effectiveness and for domestically produced vaccines across most countries. Being fully vaccinated against COVID-19 was the strongest predictor of pro-vaccine class preferences. Women and younger people were more likely to be vaccine refusers compared to men and older individuals. In some countries, vaccine hesitancy and refusal were linked to lower socioeconomic status, whereas in others, individuals with higher education and higher income were more likely to exhibit hesitancy. Our findings emphasize the need for tailored vaccination programs that consider local contexts and demographics. Building trust in national regulatory authorities and international organizations through targeted communication, along with investing in domestic production facilities, can improve vaccine uptake and enhance public health responses in the future.

Social Science & MedicineVol. 366
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Vilnius University (LT), Murdoch University (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), University of Oslo (NO), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Université Paris Cité (FR), John Hunter Hospital (AU), Hunter Medical Research Institute (AU), Riga Stradiņš University (LV), Centre de Recherche Médecine, Sciences, Santé, Santé Mentale, Société (FR), Bocconi University (IT), University of Newcastle Australia (AU), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
University of Newcastle Australia, Murdoch University, Rīgas Stradiņa Universitāte, Vilnius University, European Research Council, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle Australia, Medisinske fakultet, Universitetet i Oslo
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
26.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.