Replacing Lead-Acid and Nickel-Cadmium Stationary Batteries with Lithium-Ion – It’s Not a Simple Swap

The rapid advancement and adoption of lithium-ion batteries in battery electric vehicles and battery energy storage systems has people considering replacing their existing lead-acid and nickel-cadmium stationary batteries with lithium-ion. The potential space and weight savings can be substantial however safety, reliability, and cost are major considerations. Lithium-ion batteries pose fire risks and increased building fire loads that lead-acid and nickel-cadmium batteries do not present. Additionally, lithium-ion batteries have reliability issues, not present in lead-acid and nickel-cadmium batteries, which must be addressed. Inserting lithium-ion batteries into traditional lead-acid and nickel-cadmium roles is not a simple battery swap. The additional costs and risks must be carefully evaluated when considering a swap from traditional technologies to lithium-ion batteries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/pcic47799.2024.10832197
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Replacing Lead-Acid and Nickel-Cadmium Stationary Batteries with Lithium-Ion – It’s Not a Simple Swap

Michael O’Brien, Steven G. Harris, Miles E. Borcherdt, Hila Shadravan
1 citations
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
0.20
article

Replacing Lead-Acid and Nickel-Cadmium Stationary Batteries with Lithium-Ion – It’s Not a Simple Swap

Michael O’Brien, Steven G. Harris, Miles E. Borcherdt, Hila Shadravan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The rapid advancement and adoption of lithium-ion batteries in battery electric vehicles and battery energy storage systems has people considering replacing their existing lead-acid and nickel-cadmium stationary batteries with lithium-ion. The potential space and weight savings can be substantial however safety, reliability, and cost are major considerations. Lithium-ion batteries pose fire risks and increased building fire loads that lead-acid and nickel-cadmium batteries do not present. Additionally, lithium-ion batteries have reliability issues, not present in lead-acid and nickel-cadmium batteries, which must be addressed. Inserting lithium-ion batteries into traditional lead-acid and nickel-cadmium roles is not a simple battery swap. The additional costs and risks must be carefully evaluated when considering a swap from traditional technologies to lithium-ion batteries.

Exponent (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
0.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Replacing Lead-Acid and Nickel-Cadmium Stationary Batteries with Lithium-Ion – It’s Not a Simple Swap — Michael O’Brien, Steven G. Harris, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS