Meta-Heuristic Approaches to NP-Hard Resource Allocation in Civil Engineering: DE vs GA

In civil engineering, resource allocation refers to how best to divide resources including labor, supplies, and machinery among different jobs in building projects. This distribution is critical to meeting project deadlines, cutting expenses, and improving project efficiency. Because it is combinatorial in nature and has many constraints, resource allocation in civil engineering is categorized as NP-hard. According to the theory of NP-hardness, as a problem gets complex, it becomes computationally impossible to find an exact optimal solution in a reasonable amount of time. The complexity and uncertainty included in civil engineering projects, make traditional methods such as deterministic algorithms and linear programming unsuitable for tackling resource allocation challenges. By utilizing iterative optimization strategies motivated by mathematical models or natural processes, meta-heuristic algorithms offer a strong substitute. The capacity of meta-heuristic techniques to navigate large solution spaces and adjust to changing project restrictions and goals makes them especially well-suited for resource allocation in the civil engineering field. GA and DE are able to effectively explore and exploit solutions that standard algorithms could take longer to find in realistic timeframes by modeling biological evolution or natural selection mechanisms.In this work, this paper access and contrast Differential Evolution (DE) and Genetic Algorithm(GA) for their respective roles in resource allocation optimization in civil engineering applications. This work show through rigorous experimentation and research that Differential Evolution performs better than Genetic Algorithm in terms of convergence speed and solution quality. The study offers significant contributions to the field of civil engineering resource allocation by providing useful insights into the application of meta-heuristic methodologies. This research is expected to have a positive impact on stakeholders, engineers, and project managers, who are working on construction projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icisaa62385.2024.10829356
Primary Topic
Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meta-Heuristic Approaches to NP-Hard Resource Allocation in Civil Engineering: DE vs GA

Rashmi Benni, G K Akshata, C T Neelamma
Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
article

Meta-Heuristic Approaches to NP-Hard Resource Allocation in Civil Engineering: DE vs GA

Rashmi Benni, G K Akshata, C T Neelamma
article en

Abstract

In civil engineering, resource allocation refers to how best to divide resources including labor, supplies, and machinery among different jobs in building projects. This distribution is critical to meeting project deadlines, cutting expenses, and improving project efficiency. Because it is combinatorial in nature and has many constraints, resource allocation in civil engineering is categorized as NP-hard. According to the theory of NP-hardness, as a problem gets complex, it becomes computationally impossible to find an exact optimal solution in a reasonable amount of time. The complexity and uncertainty included in civil engineering projects, make traditional methods such as deterministic algorithms and linear programming unsuitable for tackling resource allocation challenges. By utilizing iterative optimization strategies motivated by mathematical models or natural processes, meta-heuristic algorithms offer a strong substitute. The capacity of meta-heuristic techniques to navigate large solution spaces and adjust to changing project restrictions and goals makes them especially well-suited for resource allocation in the civil engineering field. GA and DE are able to effectively explore and exploit solutions that standard algorithms could take longer to find in realistic timeframes by modeling biological evolution or natural selection mechanisms.In this work, this paper access and contrast Differential Evolution (DE) and Genetic Algorithm(GA) for their respective roles in resource allocation optimization in civil engineering applications. This work show through rigorous experimentation and research that Differential Evolution performs better than Genetic Algorithm in terms of convergence speed and solution quality. The study offers significant contributions to the field of civil engineering resource allocation by providing useful insights into the application of meta-heuristic methodologies. This research is expected to have a positive impact on stakeholders, engineers, and project managers, who are working on construction projects.

KLE Technological University (IN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.