Mass and angular momentum for the Kerr black hole in TEGR and STEGR

Abstract We study the energy–momentum characteristics of the rotating black hole–Kerr solution of general relativity in the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR) and the symmetric teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (STEGR). The previously constructed spacetime-covariant and Lorentz-invariant expressions for conserved Noether currents, superpotentials, and charges are used. The Noether charges describe the total energy, momentum, or angular momentum of a gravitational system depending on the choice of displacement vector $$\xi $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>ξ</mml:mi> </mml:math> . To define the covariant and invariant conserved quantities in both TEGR and STEGR, one needs to use external fields which are flat teleparallel connections. To determine the non-dynamical connections in TEGR and STEGR, we use the unified “turning-off” gravity principle. In addition, to analyze the Noether conserved quantities in these theories, we use the concept of “gauges.” Changes in the gauge can affect the Noether conserved quantities. We highlight two ways to turn off gravity—by $$M \rightarrow 0$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and by $$M \rightarrow 0, ~ a \rightarrow 0$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mi>a</mml:mi> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> —which give us different gauges in TEGR and STEGR. In both kinds of gauges, we obtain the expected values of black hole mass and angular momentum. Our attempts to find gauges which could lead to a correspondence to Einstein’s equivalence principle for the Kerr solution were unsuccessful in both TEGR and STEGR. However, these exercises helped us to find a related gauge for the Schwarzschild solution in STEGR that is a novel finding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Physical Journal C
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13718-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mass and angular momentum for the Kerr black hole in TEGR and STEGR

A. V. Toporensky, E. D. Emtsova, А. Н. Петров
1 citations
The European Physical Journal C
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
1.15
article

Mass and angular momentum for the Kerr black hole in TEGR and STEGR

A. V. Toporensky, E. D. Emtsova, А. Н. Петров
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We study the energy–momentum characteristics of the rotating black hole–Kerr solution of general relativity in the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR) and the symmetric teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (STEGR). The previously constructed spacetime-covariant and Lorentz-invariant expressions for conserved Noether currents, superpotentials, and charges are used. The Noether charges describe the total energy, momentum, or angular momentum of a gravitational system depending on the choice of displacement vector $$\xi $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>ξ</mml:mi> </mml:math> . To define the covariant and invariant conserved quantities in both TEGR and STEGR, one needs to use external fields which are flat teleparallel connections. To determine the non-dynamical connections in TEGR and STEGR, we use the unified “turning-off” gravity principle. In addition, to analyze the Noether conserved quantities in these theories, we use the concept of “gauges.” Changes in the gauge can affect the Noether conserved quantities. We highlight two ways to turn off gravity—by $$M \rightarrow 0$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and by $$M \rightarrow 0, ~ a \rightarrow 0$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mi>a</mml:mi> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> —which give us different gauges in TEGR and STEGR. In both kinds of gauges, we obtain the expected values of black hole mass and angular momentum. Our attempts to find gauges which could lead to a correspondence to Einstein’s equivalence principle for the Kerr solution were unsuccessful in both TEGR and STEGR. However, these exercises helped us to find a related gauge for the Schwarzschild solution in STEGR that is a novel finding.

The European Physical Journal CVol. 85(1)
Bar-Ilan University (IL), Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Kazan Federal University (RU), Moscow State University (TJ), Ariel University (IL)
Israel Science Foundation, Council for Higher Education, Kazan Federal University, High Energy Physics
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.