Endovascular embolization in the treatment of patients with closed abdominal trauma

Background. Closed abdominal trauma is often accompanied by damage to the abdominal organs and retroperitoneal space. With the development of medicine, minimally invasive methods of treating patients with bleeding due to closed abdominal trauma have become available, including endovascular embolization of the bloodstream, which allows one to avoid traditional operations (laparotomy) in this category of patients and achieve rapid rehabilitation of patients. Aim. To evaluate the possibility of X-ray endovascular embolization in the treatment of patients with closed abdominal trauma. Materials and methods. At the Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine in 2022–2024 treated 68 patients with a diagnosis of “closed abdominal trauma”, of which 14 underwent direct angiography. In 4 (28.6%) patients, the intervention was diagnostic, in 10 (71.4%) it was therapeutic and diagnostic. These patients were included in this study: 8 (57.1%) men and 6 (42.9%) women. Results. Selective embolization of the splenic artery was performed in four (28.5%) cases, the renal artery in 2 (14.2%), the lumbar artery in 2 (14.2%), and the hepatic artery in 2 (14.2%). A retroperitoneal (perinephric) hematoma was punctured percutaneously under ultrasound guidance in one case to exclude urinary leakage in a patient with a kidney injury. One (7.1%) patient required laparotomy due to recurrent bleeding. There were no complications from X-ray endovascular interventions. There were no cases of hematoma infection. One (7.1%) death in a 70-year-old patient with a closed abdominal injury, subcapsular hematoma of the spleen with comorbid pathology. Conclusion. The use of X-ray endovascular embolization made it possible to avoid traditional surgical interventions (laparotomy) in 20.6% of cases. The introduction of X-ray endovascular hemostasis is one of the priorities in the treatment of patients with closed abdominal trauma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Consilium Medicum
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26442/20751753.2024.12.202862
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endovascular embolization in the treatment of patients with closed abdominal trauma

Б. Т. Цулеискири, S.V. Novikov, M. S. Zhigalova, Mikhail M. Rogal et al.
1 citations
Consilium Medicum
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
0.57
article

Endovascular embolization in the treatment of patients with closed abdominal trauma

Б. Т. Цулеискири, S.V. Novikov, M. S. Zhigalova, Mikhail M. Rogal, Н. В. Шаврина, P. A. Yartsev, K.V. Staleva, Yu S Teterin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background. Closed abdominal trauma is often accompanied by damage to the abdominal organs and retroperitoneal space. With the development of medicine, minimally invasive methods of treating patients with bleeding due to closed abdominal trauma have become available, including endovascular embolization of the bloodstream, which allows one to avoid traditional operations (laparotomy) in this category of patients and achieve rapid rehabilitation of patients. Aim. To evaluate the possibility of X-ray endovascular embolization in the treatment of patients with closed abdominal trauma. Materials and methods. At the Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine in 2022–2024 treated 68 patients with a diagnosis of “closed abdominal trauma”, of which 14 underwent direct angiography. In 4 (28.6%) patients, the intervention was diagnostic, in 10 (71.4%) it was therapeutic and diagnostic. These patients were included in this study: 8 (57.1%) men and 6 (42.9%) women. Results. Selective embolization of the splenic artery was performed in four (28.5%) cases, the renal artery in 2 (14.2%), the lumbar artery in 2 (14.2%), and the hepatic artery in 2 (14.2%). A retroperitoneal (perinephric) hematoma was punctured percutaneously under ultrasound guidance in one case to exclude urinary leakage in a patient with a kidney injury. One (7.1%) patient required laparotomy due to recurrent bleeding. There were no complications from X-ray endovascular interventions. There were no cases of hematoma infection. One (7.1%) death in a 70-year-old patient with a closed abdominal injury, subcapsular hematoma of the spleen with comorbid pathology. Conclusion. The use of X-ray endovascular embolization made it possible to avoid traditional surgical interventions (laparotomy) in 20.6% of cases. The introduction of X-ray endovascular hemostasis is one of the priorities in the treatment of patients with closed abdominal trauma.

Consilium MedicumVol. 26(12)
Research Institute of Emergency Care (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.