Just nature recovery: A framework for centring multispecies and multi-dimensional justice in land management

A rising interest in nature recovery has expanded the focus of conservation beyond protected areas to encompass a range of terrestrial and marine areas, from forests, fields, and farms, to cities, coasts and oceans. These expansions create new practical and theoretical contestations regarding how, why, and for whom nature recovery projects should be pursued. Such contestations are particularly pronounced in Scotland, a country with a long history of struggles over land rights, widespread loss of natural habitats, and highly unequal land ownership patterns. This paper examines how different framings of justice, and different approaches to nature recovery, interact to either entrench or redress past and present injustices in a range of Scottish examples. We argue that multispecies conceptions of justice that eschew human-centric framings provide a normative basis for recovering nature, while multi-dimensional framings of justice as distributive, procedural and recognitional help specify a range of requirements for social change. Both frames highlight injustices in current trajectories and the need for alternative approaches to deliver a just transition in nature recovery. We outline a three-step process for further research on justice issues and for developing policy recommendations. This entails 1) historicising contexts, 2) considering both multispecies and multi-dimensional understandings of justice, and 3) uncovering alternative nature recovery strategies that might more explicitly foreground justice considerations. • Justice considerations can be overlooked in the planning and delivery of nature recovery projects. • Multispecies justice and multi-dimensional justice offer alternative framings of justice and how it can be achieved. • Integrating MSJ and MDJ approaches can inform nuanced analyses of nature recovery projects. • We consider the different justice concerns in a range of examples from Scottish nature recovery. • Historicizing contexts is crucial for highlighting justice concerns and creating more equitable governance alternatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.103992
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
33.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Just nature recovery: A framework for centring multispecies and multi-dimensional justice in land management

Constance L. McDermott, Caitlin Hafferty, Mark Hirons, Eric Mensah Kumeh et al.
8 citations
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
33.61
article

Just nature recovery: A framework for centring multispecies and multi-dimensional justice in land management

Constance L. McDermott, Caitlin Hafferty, Mark Hirons, Eric Mensah Kumeh, Leif Anderson, Jonathon Turnbull, Jamie Lorimer, Theo Stanley
article en
8 citations

Abstract

A rising interest in nature recovery has expanded the focus of conservation beyond protected areas to encompass a range of terrestrial and marine areas, from forests, fields, and farms, to cities, coasts and oceans. These expansions create new practical and theoretical contestations regarding how, why, and for whom nature recovery projects should be pursued. Such contestations are particularly pronounced in Scotland, a country with a long history of struggles over land rights, widespread loss of natural habitats, and highly unequal land ownership patterns. This paper examines how different framings of justice, and different approaches to nature recovery, interact to either entrench or redress past and present injustices in a range of Scottish examples. We argue that multispecies conceptions of justice that eschew human-centric framings provide a normative basis for recovering nature, while multi-dimensional framings of justice as distributive, procedural and recognitional help specify a range of requirements for social change. Both frames highlight injustices in current trajectories and the need for alternative approaches to deliver a just transition in nature recovery. We outline a three-step process for further research on justice issues and for developing policy recommendations. This entails 1) historicising contexts, 2) considering both multispecies and multi-dimensional understandings of justice, and 3) uncovering alternative nature recovery strategies that might more explicitly foreground justice considerations. • Justice considerations can be overlooked in the planning and delivery of nature recovery projects. • Multispecies justice and multi-dimensional justice offer alternative framings of justice and how it can be achieved. • Integrating MSJ and MDJ approaches can inform nuanced analyses of nature recovery projects. • We consider the different justice concerns in a range of examples from Scottish nature recovery. • Historicizing contexts is crucial for highlighting justice concerns and creating more equitable governance alternatives.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 164
Leverhulme Trust (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
Hertford College, University of Oxford, Leverhulme Trust, Economic and Social Research Council
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
33.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.