Examining AI-Based Accuracy Assessment in L2 Learners’ Writing

Despite the increasing interest in using AI tools as assistant agents in instructional settings, the effectiveness of ChatGPT, the generative pretrained AI, for evaluating the accuracy of second language (L2) writing has been largely unexplored in formative assessment. Therefore, the current study aims to examine how ChatGPT, as an evaluator, performs in evaluating the accuracy of L2 writing, compared to human evaluators. Thirty-one academic writings were assessed by two human raters and ChatGPT. Both human and AI raters evaluated L2 learners’writings based on holistic measures (i.e., IELTS academic writing rubrics), focusing on coherence, lexical resources, grammatical accuracy, and global and specific measures of accuracy, by counting grammatical and lexical errors. The results revealed a moderate positive correlation in scores from holistic measures by humans and ChatGPT. This finding suggests that AI tools have the potential to assist both human raters and EFL learners in evaluating L2 writing, thereby highlighting the effective potential of employing AI tools as pedagogical aids within educational settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25256/paal.28.2.3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Text Readability and Simplification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining AI-Based Accuracy Assessment in L2 Learners’ Writing

On-Soon Lee
1 citations
Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics
Text Readability and Simplification
0.35
article

Examining AI-Based Accuracy Assessment in L2 Learners’ Writing

On-Soon Lee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Despite the increasing interest in using AI tools as assistant agents in instructional settings, the effectiveness of ChatGPT, the generative pretrained AI, for evaluating the accuracy of second language (L2) writing has been largely unexplored in formative assessment. Therefore, the current study aims to examine how ChatGPT, as an evaluator, performs in evaluating the accuracy of L2 writing, compared to human evaluators. Thirty-one academic writings were assessed by two human raters and ChatGPT. Both human and AI raters evaluated L2 learners’writings based on holistic measures (i.e., IELTS academic writing rubrics), focusing on coherence, lexical resources, grammatical accuracy, and global and specific measures of accuracy, by counting grammatical and lexical errors. The results revealed a moderate positive correlation in scores from holistic measures by humans and ChatGPT. This finding suggests that AI tools have the potential to assist both human raters and EFL learners in evaluating L2 writing, thereby highlighting the effective potential of employing AI tools as pedagogical aids within educational settings.

Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied LinguisticsVol. 28(2)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Text Readability and Simplification
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Examining AI-Based Accuracy Assessment in L2 Learners’ Writing — On-Soon Lee · Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS