Bidirectional interplay of disgust and morality: Meta-analytic investigations

Two separate meta-analyses were conducted to test the hypotheses that moral transgressions elicit disgust and that inducing disgust may intensify moral judgments. The data supported both the elicitation hypothesis ( k = 78; g = 0.55) and the amplification hypothesis ( k = 101; g = 0.40). When examining the moderating effects of person- and measurement-related characteristics, a stronger link between morality and disgust was found in Western and Caucasian cultures compared to Asian and Eastern cultures. Trait disgust sensitivity, as opposed to state disgust sensitivity, had a more pronounced impact on moral attitudes. Disgust was most strongly associated with violations of purity and deontological morality, particularly in relation to sex- and religion-related issues. Larger effects were also observed when the direction of disgust aligned with the orientation of moral judgment. Keeping in mind the limitation of substantial heterogeneity, these findings underscore the importance of methodological approaches, sample characteristics, and individual differences in studying the bidirectional relationship between disgust and morality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Individual Differences
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.113032
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bidirectional interplay of disgust and morality: Meta-analytic investigations

Cristina Ottaviani, Francesco Mancini, Giuseppe Salvo
3 citations
Personality and Individual Differences
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
4.29
article

Bidirectional interplay of disgust and morality: Meta-analytic investigations

Cristina Ottaviani, Francesco Mancini, Giuseppe Salvo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Two separate meta-analyses were conducted to test the hypotheses that moral transgressions elicit disgust and that inducing disgust may intensify moral judgments. The data supported both the elicitation hypothesis ( k = 78; g = 0.55) and the amplification hypothesis ( k = 101; g = 0.40). When examining the moderating effects of person- and measurement-related characteristics, a stronger link between morality and disgust was found in Western and Caucasian cultures compared to Asian and Eastern cultures. Trait disgust sensitivity, as opposed to state disgust sensitivity, had a more pronounced impact on moral attitudes. Disgust was most strongly associated with violations of purity and deontological morality, particularly in relation to sex- and religion-related issues. Larger effects were also observed when the direction of disgust aligned with the orientation of moral judgment. Keeping in mind the limitation of substantial heterogeneity, these findings underscore the importance of methodological approaches, sample characteristics, and individual differences in studying the bidirectional relationship between disgust and morality.

Personality and Individual DifferencesVol. 236
Marconi University (IT), Centro di Terapia Metacognitiva Interpersonale (IT), Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
4.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bidirectional interplay of disgust and morality: Meta-analytic investigations — Cristina Ottaviani, Francesco Mancini, et al. · Personality and Individual Differences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS